Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Ilikepurple

(819 posts)

17. Yes, I agree that this sort of clarity has great political value.

Reply to QueerDuck (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 29, 2026, 02:46 PM

21 hrs ago

Your point is well taken. The soft on crime narrative the GOO has used against the Democratic Party and its candidates has been effective during my adult life. Any nuanced explanation of what’s at stake here must be prefaced by recognition that property crimes are to be taken seriously. If the GOP is allowed to run with their soft on crime narrative, everything the Democrats say will be seen by many through the lens of that bias. We have to ameliorate that presumption if we hope to have a more complex analysis reach those who are not on the same page. We often present complex ideas before making sure the underlying motives and premises are clearly understood.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

QueerDuck

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Conservative think tank behind 'broken windows' policing and Trump's anti-DEI push has a new target [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

This was always the plan, and why they constantly accused the Obama and Biden families with bogus smears. mahina Sunday #1

We can reject right-wing traps like this without defending vandalism or property destruction. QueerDuck Sunday #2

I'm not sure who here is defending property destruction as a form of political speech Ilikepurple Sunday #7

You make an excellent point about the legal debate, but the trap I'm talking about is purely electoral. QueerDuck Yesterday #12

PREACH!!!!!!! When wil we LEARN this?? This is going to be an issue in the GA Gov race. Callie1979 Yesterday #13

Yes, I agree that this sort of clarity has great political value. Ilikepurple 21 hrs ago #17

When we have mass unemployment unrest, they will want 'kill on sight' power SamuelTheThird Sunday #3

well we know where the owners live too dave99 Sunday #5

These Laws have existed for DECADES already in EVERY locality ! Vandalism - done disorderly conduct - done dave99 Sunday #4

HATE headlines like this. Just write "Manhattan Institute!" Grins Sunday #6

OR............................................ AZ8theist Yesterday #11

I'm wondering if they would apply this to Jan. 6th tourists? n/t aggiesal Sunday #8

Of course not. warmfeet Sunday #9

NOTHING applies to them. Callie1979 Yesterday #14

A front-line supporter of Trump's efforts to establish a fascist state J_William_Ryan Sunday #10

""This is aimed at trying to silence public demonstrations, public assemblies..." OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #15

I've seen a lot of CIVIL TERRORISM caught on video Martin Eden Yesterday #16