Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(2,223 posts)
2. We can reject right-wing traps like this without defending vandalism or property destruction.
Sun Jun 28, 2026, 05:58 PM
Yesterday

This is a classic political trap designed to put Democrats on the defensive, and we shouldn't take the bait.

The Manhattan Institute's push to classify basic disorderly conduct or vandalism as felony "civil terrorism" is an obvious, dangerous overreach designed to chill legitimate, peaceful first amendment assemblies. We should absolutely oppose creating authoritarian tools that can be weaponized against peaceful citizens holding those in power accountable.

But the way we win this argument is by being completely clear: peaceful protest is a constitutional right, but vandalism, rioting, and property destruction are crimes.

Mainstream Democrats have always stood for law and order alongside civil rights. We don't support broken windows, blocking highways, or destroying property. By firmly drawing that line, we completely neutralize their trap.

We can protect the First Amendment from right-wing overreach without ever giving them the ammunition to falsely claim we excuse lawlessness.

Recommendations

13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This was always the plan, and why they constantly accused the Obama and Biden families with bogus smears. mahina Yesterday #1
We can reject right-wing traps like this without defending vandalism or property destruction. QueerDuck Yesterday #2
I'm not sure who here is defending property destruction as a form of political speech Ilikepurple Yesterday #7
You make an excellent point about the legal debate, but the trap I'm talking about is purely electoral. QueerDuck 13 hrs ago #12
PREACH!!!!!!! When wil we LEARN this?? This is going to be an issue in the GA Gov race. Callie1979 13 hrs ago #13
Yes, I agree that this sort of clarity has great political value. Ilikepurple 4 hrs ago #17
When we have mass unemployment unrest, they will want 'kill on sight' power SamuelTheThird Yesterday #3
well we know where the owners live too dave99 Yesterday #5
These Laws have existed for DECADES already in EVERY locality ! Vandalism - done disorderly conduct - done dave99 Yesterday #4
HATE headlines like this. Just write "Manhattan Institute!" Grins Yesterday #6
OR............................................ AZ8theist 15 hrs ago #11
I'm wondering if they would apply this to Jan. 6th tourists? n/t aggiesal 22 hrs ago #8
Of course not. warmfeet 22 hrs ago #9
NOTHING applies to them. Callie1979 13 hrs ago #14
A front-line supporter of Trump's efforts to establish a fascist state J_William_Ryan 21 hrs ago #10
""This is aimed at trying to silence public demonstrations, public assemblies..." OldBaldy1701E 12 hrs ago #15
I've seen a lot of CIVIL TERRORISM caught on video Martin Eden 10 hrs ago #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservative think tank b...»Reply #2