Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

24601

(4,148 posts)
10. Which of the Federalist papers addresses invasion via airports? Limiting individual weapon ownership to muskets is
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 11:46 AM
Friday

is analogous to free speech, limiting publications to manual printing presses.

The exceptionally clear meaning was that a citizen should be armed with the standard weapon carried by an infantryman. Today, that would be a fully-automatic assault rifle - a 5.56 mm machine gun that fires over 700 rounds per minute. Private machine gun ownership requires a specific federal permit that involves a transfer tax, submission of ATF Form 4, passport photos, fingerprints on an FBI form, and notification to local law enforcement officials. And it is limited to weapons manufactured and registered before May 19, 1986.

During my first week of college, we each were issued a fully-functioning M-14, on which we familiarized (shooting not for record) before qualifying on the newer M-16s. The downside was having to keep them spotless.

Any reasonable reading of the founders' intent is that the British weren't the only potential target. Jefferson's "consent of the governed" also means the ability to look inward. But today, armed citizens, even with M-4s, would likely have zero chance of success against our Army & federalized National Guard - and even less versus our Marines.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court strikes dow...»Reply #10