Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

displacedvermoter

(5,169 posts)

15. Those planes are all 60+ years old.

Reply to caraher (Reply #11)

Mon Jun 15, 2026, 07:41 PM

Yesterday

I wonder how much more tinkering they can do. Much more complicated aircraft than the venerable A10, which keeps getting returned from scrap heap.

Good luck to those flying these very old remnants of an earlier time. Think Slim Pickens...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

orangecrush byronius

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Air Force B-52 bomber crashes shortly after takeoff at Edwards Air Force Base in California [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Just saw something about new Rolls Royce engines being fitted to the B52s displacedvermoter Yesterday #1

CNN has a video... 2naSalit Yesterday #4

Probably a different kind of test caraher Yesterday #11

Those planes are all 60+ years old. displacedvermoter Yesterday #15

This flight apparently was a test of an upgraded radar system caraher 23 hrs ago #16

Could be. The point of that retrofit is Bluetus 19 hrs ago #20

Very interesting, thank you... displacedvermoter 11 hrs ago #25

They are impressive, and flying any craft productively for 100 years is mind-boggling Bluetus 9 hrs ago #30

Navy doesn't have any 60 year old warships or subs, displacedvermoter 9 hrs ago #31

This would never be allowed with commercial airlines Bluetus 8 hrs ago #32

419th Flight Test Squadron LudwigPastorius Yesterday #2

I was looking at a local LA station's video feed of the base and runways BumRushDaShow Yesterday #3

Truly disintegrated. 2naSalit Yesterday #5

I saw that all 12 aboard died---correction, 8. C Moon 20 hrs ago #17

I posted a news piece about it... 2naSalit 20 hrs ago #18

Yes, very sad. C Moon 20 hrs ago #19

Yep...and it said a normal crew of five. This one had eight aboard. Bengus81 13 hrs ago #22

Engineers testing the new equipment, trainers displacedvermoter 11 hrs ago #26

Damn irisblue Yesterday #6

Holy crap! Strength to all affected! electric_blue68 Yesterday #7

Odd that the U.S. would lose a long range strategic bomber the same day as Russia OnlinePoker Yesterday #8

These airframes are so old I'm suprised sdfernando Yesterday #9

Right. And now they are trying to extend them to 2050 (that's right at 100 years of service) Bluetus 19 hrs ago #21

8 crew members believed dead after B-52 bomber crashes at California's Edwards Air Force Base chowder66 Yesterday #10

‪@meidastouch.com‬ � 24m TRAGIC NEWS: Eight crew members are believed to have been killed after a U.S. Air Force B-52 riversedge Yesterday #12

💔💔💔 ultralite001 Yesterday #13

""Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable," the base said." riversedge Yesterday #14

B52-s were stationed in Wichita at McConnell for decades when it was a SAC base. Bengus81 13 hrs ago #23

They would often fly in to what became Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #24

They don't make 'em like that anymore..... JohnnyRingo 10 hrs ago #27

I have to ask this question... ColoradoHoosier 10 hrs ago #28

Since they are designed for long haul trips BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #29