Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(63,404 posts)
7. Btw, Altman has offered shifting ideas over the years about sharing any profits from AI, and they've
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 04:15 PM
21 hrs ago

all apparently been designed to distract from the harm AI does.

Ten years ago, in a New Yorker profile, he talked about UBI becoming necessary as AI replaces jobs, but suggested it might have to be as low as only a few thousand dollars a year, because with AI we'd probably have fusion, making power practically free, and that in turn would somehow make food almost free (he's more than a little hazy on agriculture), and people would just get education from their smartphones. He admitted he hadn't calculated housing cost, and maybe doing part of the profile interviews at a Silicon Valley mansion made that harder to calculate.

Then he came up with the idea of everyone getting UBI via crypto payments after first getting their eyeballs scanned by a company he owned, with that scan also becoming their worldwide digital ID.

Then he talked about everyone being given 1 eight-billionth share of the world's compute, which they could sell or use themselves.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Donald Trump, Bernie Sand...»Reply #7