I don't call expanding the court to actually represent all the regions in the country, one-on-one, packing the court. It's modernizing the court to ensure that each district has fair representation. It's not right that some regions are overseen by a single SC judge, while another SC judge has 3 or more jurisdictions to oversee. That's not equal representation in this country, IMO.
Even after expanding the court proportionally, I actually like the idea of rotating cases. Spin that wheel! (LOL) Seriously, I like the sound of the idea that court cases are not "assigned" to a single, singular judge. Rather, they are given to a judge randomly, for all intents and purposes. I like the idea, at least, if it's done legitimately. I believe Florida already has something like this in action, but you'll never convince me it was accomplished fairly when "Loose Cannon" kept getting all of Trump's cases!
And, even tho I'm 70, I'd like to see a retirement age for the judges. Back in the days of the Founders, this wasn't such a big deal. People often died before they lost their reasoning ability. With new meds and research, people are living longer these days. And it's just a fact that those with the most money will ensure the longest lifespan for themselves. But even that doesn't ensure good functioning, reasoning power... as we can see, especially, in Alito. When you have to go back to a 14th century monk just to validate a law depriving 50% of the population of their bodily autonomy... there is definitely something "not right" with your brain. Even rich people fall prey to dementia; and they make just as big fools of themselves as anyone else. It's just that their foolishness hurts the entire country. Therefore, special rules should be made for them, IMO.
= new reply since forum marked as read