Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

pat_k

(14,002 posts)

4. The illegal executive order that mandates coordination with SSA is a...

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Fri May 29, 2026, 04:55 PM

Friday

... guaranteed way to suppress the votes of younger more mobile people in favor of those collecting social security (for which SSA is more likely to have accurate information).

The judge that failed to block so a blatant voter suppression tactic right out of the gate is either an idiot or corrupt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

FakeNoose

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Postal Service proposes requiring states to provide mail-in ballot voter lists [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Friday OP

STFU and deliver the mail Steiner. You don't get to make rules or law. pecosbob Friday #1

So, a back-door way for IQ47 to get voter information from the states who've told him to get bent AZJonnie Friday #2

Easier to break vote secrecy. They can open "to verify" and know who you voted for. SharonAnn Yesterday #21

The tools the regime are trying to build will tell them who everyone is likely to vote for AZJonnie Yesterday #22

UGH................... Lovie777 Friday #3

The illegal executive order that mandates coordination with SSA is a... pat_k Friday #4

He may be both, but his excuse was.... reACTIONary Friday #17

Illegal. Period. live love laugh Friday #5

No. There is only one reason why this regime wants to do this shit when no one else has tried or even cared to. Karasu Friday #6

They know how many are mailed idahoblue Friday #7

That would the ENTIRE GOLDEN STATE OF CALIFORNIA usonian Friday #8

just everyone over 18 and a citizen Retrograde Friday #14

Doesn't this run contrary to its consitutional definition of a postal service, namely providing roads to in2herbs Friday #9

Partisan Postal Service? 2na fisherman Friday #10

State election officials KT2000 Friday #11

Each precinct, city, county and state have different ballots, that are all printed and mailed locally FakeNoose Friday #12

Why don't we just get chips implanted in our foreheads? littlemissmartypants Friday #13

Requiring states to submit lists of mail-in voters is not part of the mission of the USPS. summer_in_TX Friday #15

This proposed rule won't be published officially until Monday. So far it doesn't show a docket number. summer_in_TX Friday #16

Why? Figarosmom Yesterday #18

A bar code tied to your name? WTF?? Bengus81 Yesterday #19

Nothin new Gum Logger Yesterday #20

Maybe the U.S. Postal Service should go to churches and find out who isn't putting money in the collection plates! RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Yesterday #23

Oh, FFS. It already takes 10 days to get an envelope to me from a bank 8 miles away. Vinca Yesterday #24