Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BobTheSubgenius

(12,241 posts)
18. This style of waging war is totally on-brand for the US military.
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 01:06 PM
12 hrs ago

Depending on era, and therefore available technologies, it has always relied on saturation bombing and massive artillery barrages in land engagements. Missiles are today's artillery, so....

If a country has the infrastructure to maintain such campaigns, the number of soldiers that come home that wouldn't have without that level of "preparation" makes it well worthwhile, IMO. In this case, however, I can find no rationale for any of it.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He is unilaterally disarming us (nt) ret5hd 19 hrs ago #1
Pretty much, yeah. OldBaldy1701E 17 hrs ago #3
Just amazing OKIsItJustMe 10 hrs ago #21
Someone will get very rich making all the new weapons to restore the stockpile. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #29
Yep! OKIsItJustMe 4 hrs ago #36
A Tomahawk Costs $2 Million. Here's Who Gets Paid to Replace It. OKIsItJustMe 4 hrs ago #37
And inadvertently reigniting the kick-starting of our phase out of dependency on fossil fuels. littlemissmartypants 17 hrs ago #6
Putin might be dangling a bonus if Trump leaves the US military crippled and without needed arms. Attilatheblond 12 hrs ago #17
Putin is getting every single thing on his US destruction wish list. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #31
He better save some ammo for the death penalty by firing squad Maggiemayhem 10 hrs ago #20
A manly man's war UpInArms 19 hrs ago #2
MAGA is saving our tax dollars from fraud, waste, and abuse IronLionZion 17 hrs ago #4
It's like a boxing match. We are the favorite and we're punching ourselves out, soon will be too tired. Walleye 17 hrs ago #5
Leaving Taiwan wide open to attack from the mainland. Smooth move Hogsbreath. Ford_Prefect 16 hrs ago #7
He has been paid off by China. Check recent unseen China ships paasing the "Blockcade" dave99 7 hrs ago #23
Exactly. China benefits a great deal from Trump's war in Iran. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #32
Is this why . . . AverageOldGuy 16 hrs ago #8
The military industrial complex has to make their money in some manner. travelingthrulife 15 hrs ago #11
Yup. republianmushroom 14 hrs ago #14
The military industrial complex must get must get much richer. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #33
Xi and Putin Miguelito Loveless 15 hrs ago #9
Yeah, there's never been a better time to make a move on Taiwan, if Xi is going to do it. LudwigPastorius 11 hrs ago #19
They will emerge as the new global superpowers. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #34
Billions and billions. twodogsbarking 15 hrs ago #10
They can replace all of it as long as AIPAC pays for it. ChicagoTeamster 14 hrs ago #12
Anyone remember popsdenver 14 hrs ago #13
Six days. Six weeks. I doubt six months. And then the unknown unknowns arrived. flashman13 5 hrs ago #25
No paywall ... BlueWavePsych 12 hrs ago #15
This is what happens when you use defensive stockpiles... ruet 12 hrs ago #16
This style of waging war is totally on-brand for the US military. BobTheSubgenius 12 hrs ago #18
Proving, once again, repukes can't govern sakabatou 10 hrs ago #22
Here's the REAL reason Trump started the Iran War jmowreader 7 hrs ago #24
One more reason why TSF would be itching for nukes: no_hypocrisy 5 hrs ago #26
Who benefits and how? Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #27
And Iran still has not surrendered. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #28
We are a kind of stupid only rich people can be. surrealAmerican 5 hrs ago #30
News blackout enid602 5 hrs ago #35
Trump and Hegseth whine that Biden did not leave a big enough stockpile. Norrrm 3 hrs ago #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Has 'Burned Through'...»Reply #18