Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(110,305 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2026, 05:27 PM 15 hrs ago

Virginia judge blocks redistricting referendum from being certified [View all]

Source: ABC7

ARLINGTON, Va. (7News) — A Virginia judge blocked the state from certifying the results of Tuesday's congressional map referendum, deeming the referendum and the bill that triggered it as unconstitutional, according to a judge's order issued Wednesday.

Virginia's current attorney general, Jay Jones, confirmed to 7News on Wednesday that his office would appeal the decision.


The order, according to officials, came from the Tazewell Circuit Court, which previously blocked the referendum after repeatedly deeming the vote and the resolution for the referendum unconstitutional, siding with Republicans who filed several suits.

Virginia voters on Tuesday narrowly advanced legislation to redraw the states Congressional maps, a move that could give Democrats 10 out of the 11 seats in the U.S. House. Currently, there are six Democrats and five Republicans representing the state.



Read more: https://wjla.com/news/local/virginia-congressional-map-redistricting-referendum-vote-attorney-general-tazewell-county-court-republicans-enjoins-injuctive-relief-voters-election-democrats-house-representatives

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Partisan activist judge, obviously. VMA131Marine 15 hrs ago #1
Hopefully well before November. PuraVidaDreamin 15 hrs ago #2
At least you didn't wear one brown shoe and one navy shoe pnwmom 15 hrs ago #8
Wow! LoisB 15 hrs ago #3
Why would this go as far as it did without legal scrutiny to make sure it's constitutional? They'll tie this up Deuxcents 15 hrs ago #4
There's been scrutiny ever since Texas began the whole thing MadameButterfly 12 hrs ago #40
Wrong move by GQPs............... Lovie777 15 hrs ago #5
Lol SSJVegeta 15 hrs ago #6
Virginia court blocks voter-approved redistricting, appeal coming LetMyPeopleVote 15 hrs ago #7
Thanks! nt pnwmom 15 hrs ago #10
That's the same judge who tried blocking it TWICE before and got swatted down BOTH TIMES by the VA SC. BumRushDaShow 15 hrs ago #9
I think he's just bored SSJVegeta 15 hrs ago #12
Little fish in a big pond and will realize he's at the bottom of the food chain. BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #13
Yupp SSJVegeta 14 hrs ago #14
Isn't is an embarrassment for a judge to be repeatedly overturned on appeal? SamuelAdams 14 hrs ago #18
The judge is a GOP loon so "embarrassment " is not on their bingo card. BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #19
thanks for the reminder - that's what i thought samsingh 13 hrs ago #27
ENCOURAGING! TY BRDS! Cha 12 hrs ago #36
Wednesday's ruling was not Hurley's first attempt to stop the amendment. LetMyPeopleVote 12 hrs ago #43
Entirely predictable. TomSlick 15 hrs ago #11
Tazewell County, pop. 40,452. maxsolomon 14 hrs ago #15
So this motherfucker represents Mervis P. Dirtwater and his in-bred hillbilly clan? Aristus 13 hrs ago #23
Well, I didn't say that. I would never impugn Appalachians who are clearly God's own people. maxsolomon 13 hrs ago #25
So he has no experience with democracy? Aristus 13 hrs ago #26
Thank you for the defense Maeve 13 hrs ago #32
From this old ... oldsoldierfadingfast 12 hrs ago #35
Oh, please...and we're supposed to believe it wasn't unconstitutional when Texas started this shit by FORCING their Karasu 14 hrs ago #16
And the media REFUSES to make that point BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #20
Which is REALLY infuriating. Karasu 11 hrs ago #48
How? Delphinus 14 hrs ago #17
Although I disagree with the judge's decision, "the people voted" bears no relevance to what judges look at Polybius 13 hrs ago #24
There appears to be two problems pcdb 12 hrs ago #44
These things are always misleading. AllyCat 12 hrs ago #45
Why not say that it's to allow or bring fairness instead? cstanleytech 6 hrs ago #53
God-DAMN, that was a short-lived victory... Aristus 13 hrs ago #21
Is said judge god? Nope. Courage, Aristus. paleotn 13 hrs ago #31
Thank you for the pat on the back. Aristus 13 hrs ago #33
It was expected. This judge has been reversed several times. Hassin Bin Sober 12 hrs ago #38
here's more DoBW 13 hrs ago #22
TY.. I always like to see what Alison Cha 12 hrs ago #39
It was expected Keepthesoulalive 13 hrs ago #28
Hope Dems Win the Appeal! Cha 12 hrs ago #41
I hope so also Keepthesoulalive 10 hrs ago #50
That's the Spirit! 💙💔☮️🌻🕯️🕊️💜 Cha 9 hrs ago #51
When you're a dick you're a dick. NoMoreRepugs 13 hrs ago #29
Can you say insta-appeal?! paleotn 13 hrs ago #30
What a piece of garbage that jackass judge is. He tried to block that redistricting initiative also, and that got lostincalifornia 13 hrs ago #34
Fear not. Bumpkin judge will be quickly overruled. Mysterian 12 hrs ago #37
Don't worry about it AverageOldGuy 12 hrs ago #42
Exactly correct Boo1 11 hrs ago #46
ABC7 in DC is a Sinclair station, it should be added. SouthBayDem 11 hrs ago #47
The story is factual, but thanks for the info about the station. pnwmom 7 hrs ago #52
So just do what Texass did... 3825-87867 11 hrs ago #49
The GOP sure does know how to play the long game LiberalArkie 4 hrs ago #54
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Virginia judge blocks red...