Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Miguelito Loveless

(5,816 posts)

1. When the court wasn't selling its verdicts

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Apr 22, 2026, 03:41 PM

Yesterday

and when it stopped at least made a pretense of following the law and the Constitution, the leaks didn't happen.

The majority on the court is openly corrupt and bent on destroying democracy in service of billionaire backed fascism and has thus abrogated its own legitimacy and debased its reputation. I have little use for legal scholar and pundit pearl clutching.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

15 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dweller dickthegrouch Pesky1 FakeNoose erronis Dave Id raging moderate Butterflies BettyBlueDot halobeam MW67 Talitha IbogaProject LittleGirl yliza

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court leak shakes institution's secrecy [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

When the court wasn't selling its verdicts Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #1

Republicans permanently destroyed any image of SC "independence" back when they manufactured an unprecedented excuse to Karasu Yesterday #2

SCOTUS destroyed itself with Bush vs Gore in 2000 DemocracyForever Yesterday #8

You're not wrong. That was the actual beginning of the end for them. Karasu 23 hrs ago #13

The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court (Gift Article) LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #3

Of course it's from The Hill, but is the fact they leaked really more substantial than the leaks? Ilikepurple Yesterday #4

Why not a leak? They're a business. usonian Yesterday #5

I'll call joshie Just Jerome Yesterday #6

The corrupt six have always been weak, stupid, and bad. ananda Yesterday #7

The Rehnquist 5 started this nightmare in 2000 DemocracyForever Yesterday #9

By definition, any leak came from inside the Court not some unnamed "the left." TomSlick Yesterday #10

Is Hawley really serious with the whole "left" johnnyfins 23 hrs ago #11

Projection as deflection. BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #12

Is it as coordinated as the attack on the Capital on Jan.6th? Buddyzbuddy 23 hrs ago #14

Carville is right, we need 13 justices!!!!! BigmanPigman 22 hrs ago #15

So the leak is "shredding trust"??? llmart 22 hrs ago #16

More like sliced ,diced,and then shredded. BattleRow 21 hrs ago #17

Yep. llmart 21 hrs ago #18

If not in 2000 popsdenver 17 hrs ago #22

Did they leak photos of Roberts kissing Trump's ass? Orrex 19 hrs ago #19

Shut up and sit down, Hawley GenThePerservering 18 hrs ago #20

Fucking Nazi PEDO Protectors. Cha 18 hrs ago #21