Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(170,683 posts)

5. But in that case

Reply to cstanleytech (Reply #4)

Sun Apr 19, 2026, 05:33 AM

5 hrs ago

the illegal war wasn't initiated by any Executive Branch "agencies", but by the dictator-in-chief as part of the fringe "Unitary Executive" theory that the SCOTUS 6 supports.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trove of documents shed rare light on Supreme Court's secretive affair with poison [View all] BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago OP

How is this sentence supposed to make sense ?? eppur_se_muova 16 hrs ago #1

No, it means what it says - basically setting a limit to what the Executive Branch agencies are allowed to do BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #3

The unconstitutional war with Iran should fit under that and the Court should be stepping in. cstanleytech 12 hrs ago #4

But in that case BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago #5

shit like this chappes my hide oldinmtdem92 15 hrs ago #2