Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: USPS to suspend pension contributions, seeks 4-cent stamp price hike [View all]MichMan
(17,191 posts)11. Explain how it was defunded when it doesn't get any taxpayer subsidies?
Unlike many government agencies, the United States Postal Service (USPS) does not receive direct taxpayer funding for operating expenses. Government appropriations are limited to specific purposes, such as the Postal Service Health Benefits (PSHB) Program.
The Fiscal Year 2025 budget request for the PSHB Program includes a continuation of the 2024 appropriation increase. These funds are specifically allocated for the operation of the PSHB program, managed within the Office of Personnel Managements Trust Fund Transfers.
A proposed legislative measure aims to secure future funding for the PSHB programs eligibility determination and enrollment systems beyond FY 2025. These government appropriations are designated for postal retirees healthcare benefits and do not represent subsidies for the USPSs general operating costs.
The Fiscal Year 2025 budget request for the PSHB Program includes a continuation of the 2024 appropriation increase. These funds are specifically allocated for the operation of the PSHB program, managed within the Office of Personnel Managements Trust Fund Transfers.
A proposed legislative measure aims to secure future funding for the PSHB programs eligibility determination and enrollment systems beyond FY 2025. These government appropriations are designated for postal retirees healthcare benefits and do not represent subsidies for the USPSs general operating costs.
https://govfacts.org/government/federal/independent-executive/usps/how-usps-stays-afloat-funding-facts-simplified/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
USPS to suspend pension contributions, seeks 4-cent stamp price hike [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
It's being systematically destroyed in preparation for privatization or elimination.
CousinIT
Yesterday
#2
"The Internet has replaced the mail delivery service for most correspondence. IMHO."
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
#6
Interestingly, in our rural area, Starlink is the only satellite service we could get.
Dixiegrrrl
Yesterday
#9
Or just fund the USPS properly, and get rid of the trump appointees running it into the ground
quakerboy
15 hrs ago
#21
All under the expert hand of DeJoy! He has financial interests in privatization of the USPS dontcha know! n/t
PatrickforB
Yesterday
#8
But the damage he did remains. I do stand corrected, but the USPS is still having DeJoy issues. n/t
PatrickforB
23 hrs ago
#13
It wasn't just him it was the Republican as a whole as they've been conspiring for decades to kill the USPS.
cstanleytech
20 hrs ago
#20
Frankly I think a national gas and diesel tax specifically for funding the postal service only is needed.
cstanleytech
20 hrs ago
#19
It may have been bad, but passed with overwhelming support by voice vote in the house & unanimous consent in the senate
MichMan
14 hrs ago
#32
You're right, it wasn't just a GOP idea and now it's been repealed, and yet
D. Spaulding
13 hrs ago
#35
I retired from USPS two years ago; I don't think there's anyway the USPS is
D. Spaulding
13 hrs ago
#34