Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(62,342 posts)
31. Apologies for misreading. The reply responding to yours mentioned breast cancer in the subject line
Sun Apr 5, 2026, 01:34 PM
Sunday

and my none-too-awake brain apparently combined them.

My relative who battled breast cancer 9 years ago had apparently beaten it, but she lost that breast and had lasting effects from chemo. Then an MRI ordered a couple of weeks ago because she was wheezing during a doctor's appointment revealed a suspicious lung nodule. A PET-CT scan last week made the lung nodule look less worrisome (but it will be checked again in three months), but found a suspicious mass in her breast that wasn't cancerous before, and she had a biopsy Friday. Should have the results in a couple more days.

I don't know if AI was used in reading any of those results.

But there's already evidence that use of AI deskills doctors:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jessepines/2026/02/23/will-ai-de-skill-doctors-evidence-is-starting-to-trickle-in/

-snip-

Recent evidence of de-skilling comes from a 2025 observational study published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. The study examined AI systems designed to detect adenomas—non-cancerous tumors in the GI tract that can sometimes transform into cancer.

In the study, endoscopists who routinely used AI assistance had a significant decline in adenoma detection from 29% to 22% during subsequent non-AI procedures. This suggest that sustained AI exposure can negatively impact measurable clinical performance.

-snip-

A study found that radiologist’s ability to catch AI-generated errors in mammograms correlated strongly with experience. In a simulated scenario where an AI system provided an incorrect suggestion, the rates of correctly read mammograms was 20% for inexperienced radiologists, 25% for the moderately experienced and 46% for the very experienced.

This raises the specter of what is called “never-skilling.” If medical trainees rely on AI-generated differentials before wrestling with clinical ambiguity themselves, the scaffolding of diagnostic reasoning that typically emerges during the years of residency training may never fully develop.

-snip-

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Won't work............ Lovie777 Saturday #1
My wife's cancer was misdiagnosed/missed by a real radiologist Fiendish Thingy Saturday #2
Breast cancer is a reality for so many women. I am so glad your riversedge Saturday #3
Or insurance companies having the ability to control what AI finds. C Moon Sunday #15
I'm so sorry your wife had to battle breast cancer. So did a close relative of mine. highplainsdem Sunday #28
It wasn't breast cancer, but still scary nonetheless Fiendish Thingy Sunday #30
Apologies for misreading. The reply responding to yours mentioned breast cancer in the subject line highplainsdem Sunday #31
Indeed - AI may leave the world even dumber than it is now after 20+ years of social media. nt Fiendish Thingy Sunday #32
LOL, what could possibly go wrong? flvegan Saturday #4
Actually... GB_RN Sunday #17
I can see it... GiqueCee Sunday #20
Human Judgment Should Never... GB_RN Sunday #23
A Human needs to sign off on the AI's output WA-03 Democrat Sunday #25
I can just hear the screaming from those who have to handle the lawsuits. Baitball Blogger Saturday #5
Better that they fire all the doctors Turbineguy Saturday #6
No AI. I want real doctors. Trueblue1968 Saturday #7
Kick dalton99a Sunday #8
AI assisting radiologists I would support but not replacing them. cstanleytech Sunday #9
Yes, I could see it as a useful tool flagging anomalies fujiyamasan Sunday #11
Oh, I agree with you as AI is not ready for soloing this type of stuff at all. cstanleytech Sunday #13
The doctor signing off on this will be the fall guy when things go wrong. hunter Sunday #26
What could go wrong? Angleae Sunday #10
Omfg, no way would I trust AI to read my X-rays. SunSeeker Sunday #12
The bastards running insurance companies and health networks won't be happy until... LudwigPastorius Sunday #14
What can POSSIBLY go wrong??? AZ8theist Sunday #16
AI has been assisting for a while now, Richi in Gerenwich Sunday #18
"major savings"... GiqueCee Sunday #19
Ever since corporate monsters took over healthcare, it has been a race to the bottom. travelingthrulife Sunday #21
I think they've been reading pap smears with imaging tools for a long time. milestogo Sunday #22
so if they make a mistake who is responsible ? Nigrum Cattus Sunday #24
Not sure about AI used for radiology results, but when AI is used to listen to appointments and generate highplainsdem Sunday #29
Everyone should require a second opinion by a human professional. mdbl Sunday #27
AI says that he is pregnant. Wonder Why Sunday #33
The backlog for MRIs and CAT scans can be weeks for cancer patients somsai Monday #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»America's Largest Hospita...»Reply #31