Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,085 posts)
37. The man behind Donald Trump's push to end birthright citizenship (suspended attorney John Eastman)
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 06:14 PM
Tuesday

John Eastman has been advancing his fringe interpretation of the 14th Amendment for decades.

The man behind Donald Trump’s push to end birthright citizenship www.politico.com/news/2026/03...

Timothy McBride (@mcbridetd.bsky.social) 2026-03-31T14:08:51.193Z

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/31/birthright-citizenship-supreme-court-john-eastman-00851127

Long before John Eastman helped devise Donald Trump’s bid to overturn the 2020 election, he had another pet cause: ending birthright citizenship.....

Yet, when Trump signed his order on the subject last year, he made no mention of the former law school dean and Supreme Court clerk’s long advocacy for the cause. And while the Justice Department’s public briefs closely track Eastman’s arguments, they don’t cite his writings or acknowledge his role as the theory’s leading evangelist.

“This is his issue,” said Linda Chavez, a longtime conservative activist and senior Reagan White House official who has sparred publicly with Eastman on the subject. “I’ve known John forever and this has been a bee in his bonnet for as long as I’ve known him.”....

Eastman has been advancing his fringe interpretation of the 14th Amendment since 2005, racking up more than 100 op-eds, interviews, law review articles, debates, speeches and legislative hearings.....

And Eastman is still battling the fallout from the 2020 election. He helped concoct the theory that Trump could cling to power by having Vice President Mike Pence refuse to count some states’ electoral votes. That didn’t persuade Pence, but did score Eastman a speaking role at Trump’s Jan. 6, 2021 rally on the Ellipse, where Eastman aired unproven claims of election fraud.

He subsequently lost his professorship at Chapman University and has been suspended from practicing law in California. He’s appealing a decision calling for his permanent disbarment in that state.

Eastman needs to be finally disbarred. This asshole is a disgrace to the legal profession.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We do not have the "best and the brightest" on our SCOTUS. MLWR Mar 29 #1
Yeah. Unfortunately... GB_RN Mar 29 #2
They're trying to enable the crafting of arguments to back up Trump's request. ChicagoTeamster Mar 29 #4
I know this is simplistic but we are all birthright citizens Srkdqltr Mar 29 #3
Insanity. This is settled law, even written into our Constitution specifically as an Amendment. Midnight Writer Mar 29 #5
Excellent comment! WestMichRad Mar 29 #9
It makes me wonder what is Kavanaugh's real position on this issue? FakeNoose Mar 29 #6
Damn, that's foul cause Dan Mar 29 #15
Yes, those are called "anchor babies" and it has been going on for a long time FakeNoose Monday #36
I didn't know he asked those questions. It's good that he asked them. LeftInTX Mar 29 #17
The Confederacy renounced their US citizenship by seceding. All of their descendants lost their birthright citizenship ChicagoTeamster Mar 29 #7
PLEASE, PLEASE Understand what EOs are and what they are not Bluetus Mar 29 #8
That is how it is SUPPOSED to work BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #11
We have to make it more difficult for Roberts Bluetus Mar 29 #14
We went through that exercise his first term BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #20
I am perfectly aware we don't control the GOP, the SCOTUS or the legacy media Bluetus Mar 29 #25
"It is crazy to just sit back and accept this. WE must do our part." BumRushDaShow Monday #30
Going down a rabbit hole, I also saw this: LeftInTX Mar 29 #19
The below is the argument they are apparently going to try to use - BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #21
They used that arguement last year LeftInTX Mar 29 #22
As long as the SCOTUS keeps refusing stays on the illegal E.O.s BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #24
Has the SCOTUS allowed any of the bogus EOs to stand permanently? Bluetus Mar 29 #26
Remember that we are ONLY just over a year into this term BumRushDaShow Monday #31
I'm sure the SCOTUS is all about helping Trump with his agenda Bluetus Monday #32
I agree with what you wrote and in particular BumRushDaShow Monday #33
Considering that 2700 pages is just a little more than 5 reams of papper. Bluetus Monday #35
I seriously doubt, Bayard Mar 29 #10
"Or any other white baby" .... Would Trump /Roberts bring back the 'one drop' rule of race determination? Norrrm Mar 29 #27
Easy peasy WestMichRad Mar 29 #28
If birthright citizenship is dropped Old Crank Mar 29 #12
As is plainly clear, "What then ?" is not a familiar question to this WH. Shoot first, ask questions later, think never. eppur_se_muova Mar 29 #13
Donald should prove that he is serious - and there is a way Dan Mar 29 #16
The Supreme Court fight does not threaten chaos. The administration's suit threatens chaos. Martin68 Mar 29 #18
Bureaucratic nightmare Mz Pip Mar 29 #23
Trump's perfect judge... Roland Freisler... original citizenship could be revoked Norrrm Mar 29 #29
'Alarm bells' ring as Trump resurrects racist arguments in major legal case: experts LetMyPeopleVote Monday #34
The man behind Donald Trump's push to end birthright citizenship (suspended attorney John Eastman) LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #37
Former Trump lawyer John Eastman arriving at the Supreme Court for the birthright citizenship debate. LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #38
Can't wait for him to be disbarred! BumRushDaShow Thursday #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court fight over ...»Reply #37