Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court rules against Colorado ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ+ kids [View all]Prairie Gates
(8,156 posts)30. There were actually two reasons for my timeframe in my post
1) No live cases (which you mentioned)
2) The political ground is not yet cleared for it. However, if the vicious right wing/ GOP/ conservative backlash against LGBTQ positions continues at its current rate, the ground will be cleared in the next few years.
There's plenty of polling on the second point. There was an Op-Ed on the erosion of LGBTQ positions in public polling in the NY Times last week, and another article covering the same ground in the Atlantic. It's bad. The right wing/GOP/conservative backlash has been relentless and successful. The corrupt Supreme Court justices still don't have the political cover to overturn Obergefell, but they may well have it soon.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court rules against Colorado ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ+ kids [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
I don't know that there's a live case coming through the courts that would challenge Obergefell
Prairie Gates
Yesterday
#15
I could accept this, though not like it, if this principle were being applied anything like equally
dsc
Yesterday
#3
This is an excerpt from the Kagan & Sotomayor concurring opinion. Justice Kagan authored it & Justice Sotomayor joined.
24601
Yesterday
#6
Yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is "only speech" as well, but it is regulated.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#16
WTF? It is not a Free Speech question. It is a medical, sociological, and ethical question.
Martin68
Yesterday
#10
If that is what the decision is based on, then it does seem reasonable to me. As long as advice is freely requested and
Martin68
Yesterday
#22
Many of the people undergoing conversion therapy are minors forced by their bigoted Christian parents.
Lonestarblue
Yesterday
#26
I agree entirely. My point is if the subject request advice, that is legit. Does the court finding allow parents to
Martin68
21 hrs ago
#31
Abuse because of a child's gender identity or sexual orientation certainly isn't a domain exclusive to Christianity.
24601
19 hrs ago
#32
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Christian counselor over Colorado on 'conversion therapy' for minors
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
#27
Deadline Legal Blog-Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson steps out alone, again - this time on 'conversion therapy'
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
#28