Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,583 posts)
7. A "Discharge Petition". Democrats could probably do that next
Fri Mar 27, 2026, 05:24 PM
Friday

All it needs is a the "technical majority" of the chamber - i.e., 218 votes, to be forced to the floor for a final vote (meaning by getting 218 signatures to discharge, it pretty much guarantees it will pass).

BUT - the issue about a discharge petition is that there is a waiting period before it can be forced on the floor for consideration meaning that the Senate bill would have to sit in committee for 30 days and once that is done and the 218 signatures are obtained, it has a 7 legislative day additional "waiting period" before it can finally move.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Johnson can't ever get trumps kacekwl Friday #1
EEEwwwww! BComplex Friday #4
Tiny thing dave99 Friday #8
I'd recommend a toothpick. Midnight Writer Friday #12
Time to send little Mikey to the moon. Just deport the POS. Trueblue1968 Friday #22
Well, it wouldn't take up a lot of room. Trump himself revealed its' ACTUAL size: AZ8theist Yesterday #24
They suddenly become concern babies... ananda Friday #2
"Miller-Meeks, R-Iowa, who is facing what could be a difficult re-election bid this fall" Strelnikov_ Friday #3
What's that move called where Massey, Greene, Mace and Boebert brought BComplex Friday #5
A "Discharge Petition". Democrats could probably do that next BumRushDaShow Friday #7
BRDS, how in the world do you know so many things? BComplex Friday #10
I worked in the federal government for over 30 years BumRushDaShow Friday #17
That's got to be hitting you really hard right now to see what's going on. BComplex Friday #21
And thank you for reading my comments and rants! BumRushDaShow Yesterday #25
Unfortunately "every major news outlet" is now totally (well, 96.7%) controlled by the BComplex Yesterday #27
"the democrats need to get this message out there" is not going to happen in the same way" BumRushDaShow Yesterday #28
I never listen to radio, except NPR, so I'm really glad to hear that! BComplex Yesterday #29
the opposite take is on FoxNews front page. House gop rages at senate. nt wiggs Friday #6
Most of the "M$M has the same Faux Snooze take BumRushDaShow Friday #9
Johnson did this so that Trump can do his grandstanding and play his "savior" role by commanding that TSA gets paid. h2ebits Friday #11
and of course, if T can do that, why didn't he do that three weeks ago? eggplant Friday #16
Dump's sock puppet orangecrush Friday #13
I guess Johnson is ok with TSA employees having to eat their Buddyzbuddy Friday #14
"Privately express"? How about PUBLICLY REMOVE? Martin Eden Friday #15
So the usual GOP plan: reject a reasonable bipartisan bill and blame the Dems. Beartracks Friday #18
It seems like a very bad move, PR-wise. NH Ethylene Friday #19
FAKE JESUS (Satan) told him to shut it down.... Jack Valentino Friday #20
Election-threatened Repukes issue tepid "Save Ass" pseudo-statements. NBachers Friday #23
Didn't Mike do this to his Senate colleagues before? newdeal2 Yesterday #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Republicans private...»Reply #7