Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DOJ says it erroneously relied on ICE memo to justify immigration courthouse arrests [View all]LeftInTX
(34,295 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 26, 2026, 01:05 PM - Edit history (2)
Because they're doing this at immigration courts, asylum interviews, citizenship swearing in ceremonies, divorce courts, small claims court, witnesses, family members and I assume ICE check ins?
As opposed to a ICE detainer in criminal court.
ICE Detainer: Triggered when fingerprints from a local arrest are shared with ICE.
And unfortunately "targeted person" could be just about anyone who is not a US citizen. (The US has a "right to refuse anyone" policy. Similar to "no shirts, no service". That doesn't mean they have to refuse, but it does mean it is subject to the whims of whoever is running the country)
(Immigration is a complicated area of the law!) OTOH, apprehending someone when they are performing a mandated civic duty under the jurisdiction of the US govt, is unconscionable.
Likewise, apprending them while they're in the hospital.... I believe ICE has also done this...
OTOH: Will anything improve??? Or will DOJ just allow this to continue??
More in-depth here; https://courthousenews.com/feds-admit-to-misleading-judge-about-ice-arrests-at-immigration-courts/
And here from 2025: https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-greenlights-ices-courthouse-arrests-in-new-york-city/ (It looks like the same case, but this is sure going slow)
Example from Reddit
With their lawyer they requested to stop their order of deportation (there was an argument that she never received the summons, I believe the case was reopened) which was granted and they also filed for the provisional waiver, the waiver would pardon her original illegal entry into the country. The process would then continue which would allow them to leave the country and reapply for a visa under a need to support her disabled child and father. They've been doing check ins for all those years, she was granted a work permit that is renewed yearly and everything was fine, the waiver was granted late last year. Problem is now the lawyer says they don't have an active stop for the order of deportation (apparently it's supposed to be renewed he had 2 requests which were both granted but then he stopped arguing under prior administrations once it was first granted there was no real risk of deportation specially during COVID so paying more to renew wasn't worth it).
This held true and after all those check ins she was never detained, there was never any issues. But without the stop, the next check in could be a risk, the lawyer tried filing for another stop of the order of deportation in july but he says it may not be granted in time for the next check in, next check in is next week.
Again the waiver was approved, everything was going well, there's no criminal record (other than the original illegal entry). Now they're waiting for the date of when they're supposed to fly out to request the visa, problem is this check in has them worried because the lawyer says under the new administration they don't follow traditional processes so something like being detained could be possible despite everything being fine for the last 8 years. Is she at serious risk?