Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(169,532 posts)

2. They probably would

Reply to msongs (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 25, 2026, 03:53 PM

Wednesday

If you use an analogy of trying to sue a state for allowing access of their highways to drunk drivers who cause fatal accidents while traversing it.

I.e., you go after the drivers, not the highway owners.

The SCOTUS recently upheld state laws that went after porn companies related to the lack of a robust "age-verification" process - Court allows Texas’ law on age-verification for pornography sites

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court rules against music industry in piracy case [View all] BumRushDaShow Wednesday OP

will it rule the same regarding porn...hmm msongs Wednesday #1

They probably would BumRushDaShow Wednesday #2

God I hate it when I agree with Clarence Thomas and support Cox on anything. ToxMarz Wednesday #3

As much as that crap COX HSI is down that probably saved 10 trillion songs Bengus81 Wednesday #4