Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

charliea

(334 posts)
10. OMG!
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 11:35 PM
Mar 19

I started out in the 70's as an aeronautical engineer at McDonald Douglas. One of the legion of engineers who worked on the F-18 and F-15. To accept a product costing around 80-100 million apiece that can't be used for it's intended purpose sounds like an f-up of monumental proportions. At the same time Lockheed Martin is proudly stating that they delivered 191 planes in 2025, not mentioning they are not actually combat ready. So we now have around 20 billion dollars worth of flight trainers. That the government would consider that acceptable is just another indicator of why we should audit the defense department because I bet Lockheed Martin wont be penalized at all if/when they get that crucial part created. (Cost plus!)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EXCLUSIVE: US poised to a...»Reply #10