Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6. I speculated on that in another thread:
Fri Mar 13, 2026, 11:58 AM
Yesterday
When I was stationed at Nellis AFB in Nevada

We deployed a squadron of F-16s from there to Ramstein AB in Germany. We took sixteen F-16s, divided into groups of 4. We maintainers and the support equipment were loaded onto four KC-10 tankers. The aircraft flew non stop to Germany with our fighters refueling as needed from the tankers. Because of the length of the flight the tankers themselves were refueled several times by other tankers that were staged along the route.

If it wasn't friendly or enemy fire that took that tanker down, what did? Other reporting mentioned that another aircraft was involved in the same incident but that aircraft landed ok. Purely speculation on my part, but my initial thought was "mid-air collision?" I wonder if a fighter attached to the refueling boom contacted the tail and damaged flight control surfaces. Or possibly it was refueling another tanker and they bumped.



edited to add link:

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-iran-war-is-that-a-damaged-tail-us-kc-135-tanker-visuals-fuel-midair-collision-buzz-11209071

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We'll never know the truth, this Administration is incapable of being truthful. dem4decades Yesterday #1
killed to protect a pedophile Blues Heron Yesterday #2
In the UK, Historian Mark Felton found parts of WWII still classified bucolic_frolic Yesterday #3
When I was writing my melm00se Yesterday #16
Maybe if genius MF47 had some bases in Afghanistan this wouldn't have happened Ponietz Yesterday #4
Mid-air collision AverageOldGuy Yesterday #5
I speculated on that in another thread: InstantGratification Yesterday #6
It is almost 100% certain that the collision was with another plane involved in the refueling operation Bluetus Yesterday #11
Correct, tankers are not normally that close InstantGratification Yesterday #18
A question about the tanker-on-tanker scenario Bluetus 5 hrs ago #22
It's amazing that the other plane survived. I saw the supposed image of the other plane and it looked pretty good! LeftInTX Yesterday #8
The number is now 13. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #7
14 wnylib Yesterday #10
7 from the first strike in Kuwait and this 6. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #12
Yes, you missed one, but you are not alone on that. wnylib Yesterday #13
They did underreport it. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #14
Everything Trump touches. Initech Yesterday #9
my granddaughter called her mother sobbing... agingdem Yesterday #15
There was no way they would have survived RetiredParatrooper Yesterday #17
A lot of people don't realize in every air war more planes have been lost to accidents than combat JohnnyRingo Yesterday #19
Sounds like exhausted -pilot error Warpy Yesterday #20
There are no parachutes on a KC-135 so the plane... S/V Loner Yesterday #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»All 6 U.S. crew members k...»Reply #6