Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(170,233 posts)
Sun Mar 8, 2026, 03:26 PM Mar 8

Hakeem Jeffries won't commit to blocking additional Iran war funding [View all]

Source: NBC News

March 8, 2026, 10:24 AM EDT


House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Sunday would not commit to blocking any additional funding for the war in Iran, saying the president has so far failed to justify the war but “we’ll cross that bridge when we get to it.”

The New York Democrat was asked on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” whether House Democrats would move to block a funding request if the White House were to ask for more money for the military. Jeffries said the administration has so far “failed to make its case ... for this war of choice in the Middle East,” and unless President Donald Trump provides a “compelling rationale,” he’s “going to have a difficult case to make on Capitol Hill.”

Congress last year approved a $900 billion defense spending bill as part of routine annual budget appropriations, and the president signed the bill into law in December. But since the U.S. began its military operation in Iran, lawmakers have been considering the need to pass additional defense spending to bolster the U.S. military.

On Tuesday, following a classified briefing for senators about the war, several lawmakers including Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., told reporters that they expect the Trump administration will ask for supplemental funding for the war effort. Coons added that he would support additional funding for troops, but, like Jeffries, he demanded more information from the administration about the war.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/hakeem-jeffries-wont-commit-iran-war-funding-defense-department-rcna262271

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Absolutely insane. SSJVegeta Mar 8 #1
Could he possibly be any weaker? kysrsoze Mar 8 #2
It's not weak. It's smart. lapucelle Mar 8 #7
And people willingly, eagerly, take the bait. QueerDuck Mar 8 #14
"Smart" iemanja Mar 8 #16
The members of the House Democratic Caucus elected Jeffries. lapucelle Mar 8 #39
I'm a citizen iemanja Mar 8 #44
Ah! A re-tread of the "Why don't you go get a job at the DOJ and tell them what to do?" Scrivener7 Mar 9 #52
No it isn't. It's a response to the mistaken claim that "we put Jeffries in power". lapucelle Mar 9 #55
What makes you think we aren't? Scrivener7 Mar 9 #56
What makes you think that I think that? lapucelle Mar 9 #58
Yes. We all know that. Scrivener7 Mar 9 #59
It's spineless Renew Deal Mar 8 #32
Folks should never assume that what they don't know, the public does not know as well. lapucelle Mar 8 #38
Ahh! A re-tread of the "We don't know what we don't know. The DOJ doesn't leak!" argument from the Garland days. Scrivener7 Mar 9 #57
What are you even talking about at this point? lapucelle Mar 9 #60
Yes. We know. Scrivener7 Mar 9 #61
So interesting when "I don't know" morphs into "The public doesn't know", lapucelle Mar 9 #63
Do you think you haven't been clear you think Jeffries is doing all that can be done, and do you Scrivener7 Mar 9 #64
Please do not presume to tell me what I do or do not think. lapucelle Mar 9 #69
Lol! Have a lovely day. Scrivener7 Mar 9 #70
"We'll cross that bridge when we come to it"? GenThePerservering Mar 8 #3
When there is a bill appropriating additional funding Jose Garcia Mar 9 #71
Why on earth would Leader Jeffries play into Kristen Welker's hands lapucelle Mar 8 #4
Denial isn't a place in Egypt. choie Mar 8 #6
Jeffries understands well the possibility of winning some Republican votes to our side. lapucelle Mar 8 #9
Why does this sound similar angrychair Mar 8 #24
Jeffries does have a plan, and he has executed on it with results. lapucelle Mar 8 #35
This isn't about discharge petitions angrychair Mar 8 #37
No, your post was about a "plan". N/T lapucelle Mar 8 #41
Absolutely disgusting choie Mar 8 #5
I want to hear Dems expressing outrage that #rump has no "compelling rationale" William Seger Mar 8 #8
And basically, there is no bridge to cross. ananda Mar 8 #10
It's right there in the first four minutes of the Welker interview with Jeffries this morning. lapucelle Mar 8 #11
Yes, you're correct, and my comment should refer to the nbcnews.com article William Seger Mar 8 #13
We need to wait for the "right time" Renew Deal Mar 8 #33
Keep that powder dry! durablend Mar 8 #36
Now that we're there, The Madcap Mar 8 #12
That is a pro-war position iemanja Mar 8 #17
No...not really. The Madcap Mar 8 #20
Yes, really. iemanja Mar 8 #21
I just want it to end. The Madcap Mar 8 #30
That isn't going to happen iemanja Mar 8 #45
Of course, he won't iemanja Mar 8 #15
Just say no.... Bayard Mar 8 #18
This is not smart... slightlv Mar 8 #19
Pathetic Prairie Gates Mar 8 #22
AIPAC denvine Mar 8 #23
DING DING DING DING! Alpeduez21 Mar 8 #26
🤣😂🤣😂🤣 QueerDuck Mar 8 #28
AIPAC without a doubt Ponietz Mar 9 #62
Yup orangecrush Mar 9 #67
Just a thought, but... returnee Mar 8 #25
There is no bridge Alpeduez21 Mar 8 #27
WTF is wrong with these people? Just once I'd like to hear an answer that isn't the weakest possible response. Scrivener7 Mar 8 #29
More money? Yeah, not for this one but for the NEXT one,and then the NEXT one...... Bengus81 Mar 8 #31
"The Administration has failed . . . "? colorado_ufo Mar 8 #34
JFC Skittles Mar 8 #40
You know, I'm getting pretty disenchanted with these institutionalists. We need CHANGE. n/t PatrickforB Mar 8 #42
While he's at it, he can get some pointers from Schumer about writing a strongly-worded letter nt Rob H. Mar 8 #43
Maybe a cheerleader can tell us that criticism of Jeffries is "why we lose" Orrex Mar 9 #46
Please tape or staple these instructions on the tip of Jeffries' and Schumer's noses ScubaDave Mar 9 #49
For Now, I Am With Jeffries DallasNE Mar 9 #47
Starting this war was the really really really stupid thing. Scrivener7 Mar 9 #54
What do you think is going to happen if he gets more $$$? TBF Mar 9 #72
Why can't we play hardball? Trump just said he won't sign any bill until the "save act" passes. NowsTheTime Mar 9 #48
sounds like a reasoned and considered position to me. stopdiggin Mar 9 #50
Amuse the fool. Kick the can down the strasse. usonian Mar 9 #51
🙌 Our Leader! Hakeem Jeffries . Always .....🔳🔳🔳 Bread and Circuses Mar 9 #53
WTF hakeem?!!! Clouds Passing Mar 9 #65
Of course not orangecrush Mar 9 #66
I'll presume he's holding the cards close to his chest Torchlight Mar 9 #68
How could Jeffries BLOCK additional funding, anyway? maxsolomon Mar 9 #73
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hakeem Jeffries won't com...