Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(168,435 posts)
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 02:56 PM Tuesday

US considering military support for Middle East oil and gas supplies [View all]

Source: Politico

03/03/2026 01:32 PM EST


The Trump administration is considering providing military protection to oil and gas tankers traversing the Strait of Hormuz in a bid to cool energy prices that have surged since Iran warned it would attack ships at the choke point, two people said Tuesday.

“Military support for oil and gas supplies,” a person familiar with the discussion who was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations said when asked about the potential for U.S. naval vessels to escort ships traveling through the strait. “It’s becoming a growing concern that the energy markets could face pressures in the coming days as the military campaign intensifies and expands in geographic scope. Access to the Straits of Hormuz is obviously vital for both natural gas and crude oil shipments, especially from Qatar and Saudi.”

U.S. oil prices have risen nearly $10 per barrel since the end of last week as the fighting has continued. That increase has started to filter down to gasoline prices, which are poised to climb higher than when President Donald Trump took office last year.

The administration is also considering potentially having the U.S. government back the insurance needed for tankers to continue traveling through the strait, said a third person familiar with the discussions. While the strait remains technically open, marine insurance companies are hiking rates and in some cases canceling coverage for tankers that traverse the area.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/03/iran-oil-energy-military-trump-hormuz-00808825



WTAF????

There are "Live Updates" breaking about this ridiculous scenario right now.

“Military support for oil and gas supplies,” a person familiar with the discussion who was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations said when asked about the potential for U.S. naval vessels to escort ships traveling through the strait.

(snip)

The administration is also considering potentially having the U.S. government back the insurance needed for tankers to continue traveling through the strait, said a third person familiar with the discussions.


Where is the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for this? Why not ask Muskrat to kick in a couple hundred million.
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bet ya the oil Traildogbob Tuesday #1
Crazy! ruet Tuesday #2
China... Justice matters. Tuesday #38
So, we are going to endanger US lives Miguelito Loveless Tuesday #3
Yeah... who will want to risk their life working on those tankers? nt Justice matters. Tuesday #39
So how about calling the whole goddamn thing off Klarkashton Tuesday #4
Snip from BBC nitpicked Tuesday #5
They can't get Americans out but guard the oil. Srkdqltr Tuesday #26
Seems like a sensible consideration to me, help tamper down the oil market jitters EX500rider Tuesday #6
There are too many tankers and cargo ships stuck in the Strait right now BumRushDaShow Tuesday #8
Might be other navies will to help with that, their economies depend on it EX500rider Tuesday #10
There are a bunch of countries who have been against our actions against Iran BumRushDaShow Tuesday #15
How willing they are or not will change if they run out of oil due to the Iranians stopping tanker traffic EX500rider Tuesday #20
China has already been obfuscating their ships to get what they need BumRushDaShow Tuesday #21
FUCK yes....what an absolute clown show, ran by the head clown himself democratsruletheday Tuesday #29
I keep seeing images of the maritime situation at the moment BumRushDaShow Tuesday #31
It is not sensible sarisataka Tuesday #11
"the Iranians could overwhelm a ship with a swarm attack" - EXACTLY!!!!!!!! BumRushDaShow Tuesday #17
Once the Iranian's lose total air control Predators overhead firing on any anti-vessel activity will slow that down fast EX500rider Tuesday #22
Recall how difficult it was to find Hussein's SCUD launchers sarisataka Tuesday #23
Both aerial surveillance & the kill chain speed are vastly different now then in 1991 though EX500rider Tuesday #35
Don't forget the people who 45 keeps claiming were "obliterated" (the Houthis) BumRushDaShow Tuesday #28
Yeah but they get all their weapons from Iran who I doubt has any to spare now EX500rider Tuesday #34
Remember who has helped Iran ramp up production BumRushDaShow Yesterday #42
I doubt the Russians have any to spare for the houthis either EX500rider Yesterday #44
They have their own production that can be distributed BumRushDaShow Yesterday #45
Yes the Russians have their own production facility for Shahed drones EX500rider 20 hrs ago #47
They don't necessarily need them all for Ukraine BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #48
Not a chance, Egypt is losing billions a year due to Houthi strikes on vessels EX500rider 19 hrs ago #49
I'm not necessarily talking about Egypt BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #50
No sane Egyptian is helping by smuggling anti-ship assets across Egypt for Russia EX500rider 19 hrs ago #51
Stop fixating on "Egypt" BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #54
Yes currently in CULTURALLY ARAB countries the Houthis are unpopular EX500rider 18 hrs ago #55
Doesn't even matter which nationality or politically-affiliated group BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #56
Undoubtedly they're low on weapons EX500rider 18 hrs ago #57
They don't need that many to cause havoc in Israel BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #58
Oil immediately crashed nitpicked Tuesday #13
It's generally been trading in the $70 - $75 range for the past week BumRushDaShow Tuesday #18
What about oil in the Gulf of Tonkin? Is the USS Maine available? underpants Tuesday #7
We did the same thing during the Tanker War phase sarisataka Tuesday #9
But there is ANOTHER HUGE DIFFERENCE BumRushDaShow Tuesday #12
We never said we would guarantee the money part before questionseverything 19 hrs ago #53
little child rapist Whip-poor-will Tuesday #14
Socialize the costs, privatize the profits Brother Buzz Tuesday #16
What better time to start moving away from oil all together? OC375 Tuesday #19
In less than 200 years,oilmen have created a colossal mess delisen Yesterday #46
GOP Grand Oil Party Emile Tuesday #24
Ground troops were deployed to Vietnam merely to protect the airfields, don't forget Prairie Gates Tuesday #25
We've entered the " Way Back Machine for Wars " .....we're re-living Bread and Circuses Tuesday #27
"Why not ask Muskrat to kick in a couple hundred million." Polybius Tuesday #30
Not "ironic" BumRushDaShow Tuesday #32
I get what you're saying, but I don't want and EV head to be forced to pay specifically for oil Polybius Tuesday #36
It might not just be "for oil" either BumRushDaShow Yesterday #43
but FUCK YOU if you want affordable health insurance Skittles Tuesday #33
Yes. Where's the $$ for this? And was it part of the "plan?" Grins Tuesday #37
Probably just occurred to Trump that midterms might not Jarqui Tuesday #40
Gas was up to $5.49 a gallon yesterday CountAllVotes 19 hrs ago #52
Happened on this youtube video... NowsTheTime Yesterday #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US considering military s...