Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Epstein files contain explicit but unsubstantiated claim that Trump abused minor [View all]AZJonnie
(3,454 posts)I'm inclined to believe they're thinking the claims aren't super positively incriminating for Trump, or their tone would be different. This is "our side" here with the Guardian
Also we really don't know WHY there were 4 interviews, but one possibility is simply "due diligence", getting all the claims documented. Maybe there was a plan for that many interviews from the start, maybe she felt she could only do 1 hour per interview for instance.
The REST of us do need to see them, and it does seem sketchy they were not released initially/until people noticed they're missing, but I'm not holding out a ton of hope based on the Guardian's tone that the facts are going to be all that damaging to IQ47. I hope I'm wrong.
The fact the she was rejected by the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund is not a very encouraging point either AFA how believable her story sounds overall. It was known to be pretty generous re: its inclusiveness, fwiw.