Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

surfered

(12,768 posts)

8. Here's the law.

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Fri Feb 27, 2026, 03:13 PM

Yesterday

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 not only protected access to clinics, but also specifically amended the federal criminal code to prohibit: “intentionally injuring, intimidating, or interfering with, or attempting to injure, intimidate, or interfere, any person by force, threat of force, or physical obstruction exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship.”

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MichMan

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attorney general announces indictments against 30 more people who protested at a Minnesota church [View all] Omaha Steve Yesterday OP

Wow. These people just keep doubling down johnnyfins Yesterday #1

Since when is simple trespassing (at most) a federal crime? Klarkashton Yesterday #2

I have been wondering the same Lifeafter70 Yesterday #3

they're contending they prevented freedom of religion maxsolomon Yesterday #12

ICE prevents freedom of speech Bayard Yesterday #15

But it's okay for ICE to attack a house of worship? sinkingfeeling Yesterday #4

They got a grand jury to indict? rzemanfl Yesterday #5

I the article doesn't say if these are grand jury or not. Are these felonies? Hassin Bin Sober Yesterday #10

As these moronic charges keep occuring, the costs of wasted judicial time keep mounting. mpcamb Yesterday #6

This going no where...... Lovie777 Yesterday #7

Here's the law. surfered Yesterday #8

I don't believe they used force or a threat of force or physical obstruction. maxsolomon Yesterday #13

Another case that'll probably be dismissed Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #9

If this represents what people of religious faith think - no wonder more and more people are rejecting religion. walkingman Yesterday #11

This is BULLSHIT to add more just to STALL everything? bluestarone Yesterday #14

More of the DOJ joke, Bondi. republianmushroom Yesterday #16