Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,709 posts)
12. Really? Christian Nationalists who put the pedophile in power again are not hardline fundamentalists?
Mon Feb 23, 2026, 06:16 PM
20 hrs ago

Their views on, say, women's rights are not entirely different, albeit the scale is worse in Iran, but the direction is equivalent.

The United States is rapidly becoming a pariah country.

I may hold a different opinion on the distinction between Iran and the United States than other people, but that's just me maybe.

It does seem to me - and I understand nuclear technology extremely well - that 480 kg of 60% enriched uranium isn't very much.

I oppose all nuclear weapons; but I also oppose all dangerous fossil fuel weapons, the latter of which killed vastly more people even in the only nuclear war ever observed, the oil war between the United States and Japan between 1941 and 1945.

However. If I were the Iranian government, which is possibly only slightly more insane than our government is right now, I would rather shrug off the hypocrisy.

The observed effect of nuclear standoffs - and let's be clear people seem to enjoy bombing Iran these days - is that people become scared of fighting major wars. That may be the reason that the Iranians are trying to put a scare into their enemies.

I'm not saying I endorse the Iranian government, nor do I endorse the decidedly less than sane American government, which has enough nuclear weapons to end life on Earth, but I do understand why they might wish to possess a nuclear weapon. I don't approve of nuclear weapons, as stated above,

Both India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons, and occasionally their militaries shoot at each other, but they don't have nuclear wars.

I sometimes wonder if the nuclear standoff between the United States and the former Soviet Union prevented a dangerous fossil fuel war.

It may be that nuclear weapons and the possession of them has a sobering effect that the inventor of poison gas warfare, Fritz Haber, (who won the Nobel Prize for making it possible to supply billions of people with food to eat) thought poison gas might have, to make people afraid of having wars. I'm not arguing in favor of that case, nor do I find it acceptable, but I certainly understand the rationale.

The United States is collapsing into an international pariah. We have no ethical standing to complain about Iran.

For the record, for decades, almost all of the world's research reactors in universities and the like, used 95% enriched uranium.

They no longer do, but it was the case for decades. The number of nuclear wars that have resulted from highly enriched uranium has been one for more than 80 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iranian foreign minister ...»Reply #12