Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,861 posts)
17. I would be interested in knowing what the impact of other positions
Mon Feb 23, 2026, 12:57 PM
Yesterday

would have been.

From memory, she was seen as being less pro-Israel than Biden. Biden himself took steps to reject sending some of the strongest weapons to Israel. If this is correct, this means that both Biden and Harris had moved to less pro Netanyahu positions.

So, what position could they have taken and what would its impact be? I would imagine that the next step they could have taken was a complete ban on offensive weapons to Israel. (That would still allow defensive weapons, such as replenishing what was needed for the Iron Dome ). Although difficult to test after an election, if their analysis leading to these conclusions involved polling voters, they could ask how they would have voted had she stated that was her position. Obviously, there might be vote changes in both directions. One caveat is that asking now, they first need to ask, knowing what you know now, how would you vote to make sure they are not just picking up people regretting their vote.

I actually think it might not have been Harris's position, but the War in Gaza itself that was the problem because of our decades long weird relationship with Israel.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Russian bots and no doubt GOP operatives pushed this to divide the the party. usonian Yesterday #1
here is the proper link Celerity Yesterday #2
I would be interested in knowing what the impact of other positions karynnj Yesterday #17
Thank you for the link now in the OP. PufPuf23 Yesterday #19
Fuck all this nitpicking, what about the big things - Russian interferance and corporate money? groundloop Yesterday #3
And Republican ownership of media... Chemical Bill 14 hrs ago #28
Add it to the list. A whole lot of things cost her votes. thesquanderer Yesterday #4
She was a great candidate who was poorly placed by a botched primary. travelingthrulife Yesterday #6
Actually the short campaign window wasn't short enough Shrek Yesterday #9
More time wouldn't necessarily have helped, but... thesquanderer Yesterday #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Omaha Steve Yesterday #5
Large portions of the world population believe that the Israeli state apparatus, IDF, and settler conduct Prairie Gates Yesterday #7
So they voted for Trump. That makes perfect sense. yardwork Yesterday #8
It cost the Dems something to believe that sentiment could be ignored and belittled Prairie Gates Yesterday #10
How do you know they made that calculation? yardwork Yesterday #12
We all saw the kids out in the streets against the war womanofthehills 23 hrs ago #23
Note that I agree with you. PufPuf23 Yesterday #20
How did that work out for them? Mz Pip Yesterday #11
Allowing a genocide isn't good Prairie Gates Yesterday #13
Can't find it at the link Mysterian Yesterday #14
Sufficient to change the outcome? Grins Yesterday #16
The reason made the post was that the story was the top of the Times of Israel liveblog. PufPuf23 23 hrs ago #21
You-Gov poll, internal poll & exit womanofthehills 23 hrs ago #24
Yeah, they sure showed her Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #18
Supporters of the choices being made by Israel poured lots of funds via PufPuf23 23 hrs ago #22
Remember Trump lying big time during his campaign womanofthehills 22 hrs ago #25
No RandySF 22 hrs ago #26
IMO, she lost because Trump's lies, fear-mongering and bigotry attracted more votes than decency. Doodley 22 hrs ago #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democrats' internal revie...»Reply #17