Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,090 posts)
11. No, the equal time rule is not the same as the fairness doctrine.
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:30 PM
Yesterday

The equal time rule is a statutory requirement that has its origins in the 1927 Radio Act and was retained as part of the Communications Act of 1934. It applies to "uses" -- e.g. appearances -- by legally qualified candidates on broadcast radio or television stations, subject to various exceptions, occurring during a specified window preceding an election.
As a communications attorney for more than four decades, I can confirm that the repeal of the fairness doctrine has not stopped broadcasters from receiving and complying with non-exempt equal time requests.

The Fairness Doctrine was an FCC- created policy, first established in 1948, that required broadcast tv and radio stations to cover "controversial issues of public importance" in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints -- as determined by the broadcaster in its discretion. And, as a communications attorney for more than than four decades, I can confirm that the impact of the fairness doctrine was not nearly as significant as some claim.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navarro: Democratic presi...»Reply #11