Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(3,673 posts)

1. I thought the Andrew formerly known as Prince...

Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:27 PM

23 hrs ago

...had already been removed from the line of succession when he was stripped of his royal title. Evidently not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Government considers removing Andrew from royal line of succession [View all] Wicked Blue 23 hrs ago OP

I thought the Andrew formerly known as Prince... cab67 23 hrs ago #1

Not true and it's happened befroe. Angleae 20 hrs ago #10

Only because Edward VIII had no children. dickthegrouch 17 hrs ago #14

He is still 8th in line Wicked Blue 19 hrs ago #13

on nose. Javaman 23 hrs ago #2

It would never happen anyway FakeNoose 22 hrs ago #3

I tend to agree, but I think it may be more symbolic than anything else. hamsterjill 22 hrs ago #5

Agreed FakeNoose 17 hrs ago #15

Point Taken. hamsterjill 17 hrs ago #16

Only now? Miguelito Loveless 22 hrs ago #7

These things must be done delicately... QueerDuck 20 hrs ago #11

The royals belong in a zoo installation at the British Museum. PufPuf23 21 hrs ago #8