Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(167,841 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 10:05 AM Friday

Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]

Source: CNBC

Published Fri, Feb 20 2026 10:03 AM EST Updated 12 Min Ago


The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a huge chunk of President Donald Trump’s far-reaching tariff agenda, in a major rebuke of the president’s key economic policy. The law that undergirds those import duties “does not authorize the President to impose tariffs,” the majority ruled six to three in a decision Trump had been awaiting.

The ruling is a massive loss for Trump, who has made tariffs — and his asserted power to impose them on any country at any time, without congressional input — a central feature of his administration’s economic and foreign policies. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. The ruling was silent on whether tariffs that have been paid under the higher rates will need to be refunded.

Since retaking the White House, Trump has rapidly reshaped America’s longstanding trade relationships by imposing a staggering array of import duties that have touched nearly every country on earth. Many of those tariffs were invoked using a novel reading of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. They include Trump’s near-global “reciprocal” tariffs, and separate duties related to the alleged trafficking of deadly drugs into the U.S.

IEEPA does not explicitly mention tariffs, and the court ruling Friday said it the law does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs. Instead, it allows the president to “regulate … importation” of foreign property transactions after declaring a national emergency in order to deal with certain “unusual and extraordinary” threats. The Trump administration has argued that language empowers the president to impose tariffs on foreign goods.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/20/supreme-court-trump-tariffs-ruling.html



Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf

Someone in the chat at SCOTUSBlog indicated -

6-3, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh dissent



Article updated.

Previous articles/headline -

Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs

Published Fri, Feb 20 2026 10:03 AM EST Updated 12 Min Ago


The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a huge chunk of President Donald Trump's far-reaching tariff agenda. The law that undergirds those import duties "does not authorize the President to impose tariffs," the majority ruled six to three. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

Since retaking the White House, Trump has rapidly reshaped America's longstanding trade relationships by imposing a staggering array of import duties that have touched nearly every country on earth. Many of those tariffs were invoked using a novel reading of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. They include Trump's near-global "reciprocal" tariffs, and separate duties related to the alleged trafficking of deadly drugs into the U.S.

IEEPA does not explicitly mention tariffs. Instead, it allows the president to "regulate ... importation" of foreign property transactions after declaring a national emergency in order to deal with certain "unusual and extraordinary" threats. The Trump administration has argued that that language empowers the president to impose tariffs on foreign goods.

Critics charged that the law does not permit the president to unilaterally impose levies of any size on any country at any time. A federal trade court and a federal appeals court both found Trump's IEEPA tariffs illegal before the Supreme Court took up the case. The majority of U.S. tariff revenue generated last year came from the IEEPA duties.



Published Fri, Feb 20 2026 10:03 AM EST Updated 3 Min Ago

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a huge chunk of President Donald Trump's far-reaching tariff agenda.

The law that undergirds those import duties "does not authorize the President to impose tariffs," the majority ruled.


This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.



Original article -

Published Fri, Feb 20 2026 10:03 AM EST


This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nice but will Mr. Dump follow the ruling? mdbl Friday #1
He claimed he had "alternative methods" BumRushDaShow Friday #2
There is another law that allows a president to impose tariffs in an "emergency" Fiendish Thingy Friday #13
SCOTUSBlog had a little discussion on that BumRushDaShow Friday #18
Of course he did. Joinfortmill Friday #27
Bombing Iran is the "alternative" that will justify an "emergency". live love laugh Yesterday #85
I would be surprised if that "limited strike" didn't happen this weekend BumRushDaShow Yesterday #86
Everybody knows that NJCher Friday #24
I think the correct question is tavernier Friday #83
Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh keep their lips firmly oasis Friday #3
Seriously, they don't care about the existing law, Constitution, or precedent. mdbl Friday #6
Each one has a personal history of corruption. oasis Friday #15
Like other Republicans they aim more towards the middle of his cheeks and it involves their tongues more than their lips cstanleytech Friday #7
They have no shame. Zero oasis Friday #14
You have to hand it to them: Aristus Friday #21
A memo to all White House employees...... louis-t Friday #4
Iran, girl, you in danger! Prairie Gates Friday #9
They are as good a distraction as any! nt Shermann Friday #55
EMERGENCY ALERT!! wnylib Friday #44
So, they gave him the idea that he had immunity, and now it's their privilege to pull back Baitball Blogger Friday #5
For Alito and Thomas to dissent is obvious, but for Kavanaugh to do so is really telling Prairie Gates Friday #8
Better part of a million, as I recall from Drunky McJustice's hearing . . . hatrack Friday #12
Boof Squee BeerBeerBeer!!! VGNonly Friday #65
Hahahaha!! As if Kavanaugh has any "fundamental principles" AZ8theist Friday #31
Thomas & Alito was no surprise, Kavanaugh was IMO KS Toronado Friday #32
Someone must have reminded him YodaMom2 Friday #49
Too bad his buddy Jeffrey is no longer around not fooled Friday #38
Hey, child fucker, perch on this Aviation Pro Friday #10
No surprise that the nazi enablers, alito, thomas, and kavanaugh disented. They don't believe in lostincalifornia Friday #11
They are sucking Trump's ass. Ray Bruns Friday #20
They'll be getting the rebates ;) n/t Cheezoholic Friday #42
What is tRump's Plan B. BigmanPigman Friday #16
How about shucking his bloated mortal coil? Aviation Pro Friday #17
Some people make the world a better place wnylib Friday #45
It's reported that he's seeking a "workaround". oasis Friday #22
A.K.A reach around.. BattleRow Friday #84
National emergency declaration coming soon! WestMichRad Friday #25
Exactly. With Trump, everything is an emergency. Marie Marie Friday #76
Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and Samuel Alito dissented" Ray Bruns Friday #19
It sickens... GiqueCee Friday #29
Ha ha! WestMichRad Friday #23
Squeaked by, thank God. Joinfortmill Friday #26
kavanrapist is a stooge samsingh Friday #28
🎼Roll back the tariffs we'll have a barrel of fun.🎼 oasis Friday #30
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court rules Trump doesn't have the tariff authority he claimed LetMyPeopleVote Friday #33
Thank you BRDS, this is good news mahina Friday #34
Roberts delivered the opinion/judgment of the Court. Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissent.🚨 riversedge Friday #35
The ultimate cancel culture. nt Xipe Totec Friday #36
Some tariffs were imposed because of 'attitude' of foreign leaders, or judicial actions of nations TSF wiggs Friday #37
Right. 70sEraVet Friday #67
So is inventing law out of whole cloth an OFFICIAL duty of the president? bucolic_frolic Friday #39
Why did this take so LONG!?! This should have happened a year ago.... FakeNoose Friday #40
Orange pedo should have to personally repay the tariffs moonshinegnomie Friday #41
Lutnik and his sons (and other Wall Streeters) will make "astronomical sums" from this SC decision. sop Friday #43
Standing with billionaires. Distancing from trump. Bluetus Friday #46
I honestly don't believe that the companies deserve to get much if any money back. cstanleytech Friday #47
Trump should have to pay refunds out of his personal fortune to all of us. Linda ladeewolf Friday #48
my guess was gorsuch alito and thomas. barbtries Friday #50
Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh just showed us . . . AverageOldGuy Friday #51
A non-treasonous decision from this Supreme Court? hay rick Friday #52
"A non-treasonous decision from this Supreme Court?" BumRushDaShow Friday #54
They are who we think they are. hay rick Friday #58
Supreme Court Justices don't write the laws, they just interpret them FakeNoose Friday #56
The way-out wacky ones seem to be in the majority lately.... NowsTheTime Friday #79
So I would assume angrychair Friday #53
Consider the complications FakeNoose Friday #60
I get it angrychair Friday #68
I hope you're right, because they OWE us, Chump owes us FakeNoose Friday #69
The class actions where the lawyers pocket a substantial portion and the plaintiffs get a token amount? MichMan Friday #73
I agree angrychair Friday #74
Columbia didn't pay the tariffs; you did....to the federal government. Columbia was disenfranchised by the tariffs NowsTheTime Friday #78
So you're saying all the American Importing companies kept the tariff money? FakeNoose Friday #80
I can't say for sure I guess .....and no, we will never get the money back, Federal gov't collected it. NowsTheTime Friday #81
It looks like the political hacks on this "court," if we call this arm of legal.... NNadir Friday #57
They only thing that makes them move is BumRushDaShow Friday #59
We can only hope this will finally make trump stroke out Bayard Friday #61
At this point I'll settle for prices coming back down about 15 or 20% FakeNoose Friday #66
Trump will announce that SCOTUS is the deep state & should be dissolved, in 5, 4, 3, ... aggiesal Friday #62
I want my fucking refund check..... NOW!!!! LilElf70 Friday #63
Dems, listen up. The magic word of 2026 is CLAWBACK Bluetus Friday #64
"...signature economic policy." MorbidButterflyTat Friday #70
Tariffs are gone, but prices will continue to go up... malthaussen Friday #71
I'd have bet money that they'd simply rubber-stamp it 6:3 Orrex Friday #72
IIRC, this lawsuit was brought by a Leonard Deminpenn Friday #75
So half of the republican members of the Supreme Court still support the Constitution thought crime Friday #77
In all honesty... SirReal69 Friday #82
Early days yet to worry about getting the tariff money back that you paid. Aussie105 Yesterday #87
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court strikes dow...