Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostnfound

(17,462 posts)
58. Those are good, constructive ideas. In NC, though, the GOP just grabbed election processes for themselves...
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 09:44 AM
Friday

We are stuck playing whack-a-mole against a well-funded GOP intent on undermining democracy no matter what it takes….instead of having a legitimate opposing party with whom to compromise, collaborate or co-create solutions. (Ha! Laughable, isn’t it?)

The previous North Carolina Democratic governor Roy Cooper had stopped an attempt by the red legislature to steal authority for elections for themselves. A court ruling agreed that it needed to stay in the executive branch.

So the GOP changed tactics, and passed a law to put elections in the hands of the state auditor, also republican, but in the executive branch. https://www.courthousenews.com/north-carolina-governor-continues-fight-for-control-of-elections-boards/

After a separate panel of North Carolina Court of Appeals judges stayed the lower court’s ruling and allowed the auditor to gain control over appointments until the appeal is resolved or the court issues another decision, Boliek promptly flipped the majority on the state board of elections from Democratic to Republican and replaced the board’s executive director with the former general counsel for the speaker of the house.

In addition to the state board of elections, Boliek also gained the ability to appoint members to county election boards, and choose the board chair. Prior to the change, the governor had appointed members to the state board since 1901.

The state GOP has tried several times since 2016 to secure control over the state board of elections, which operates voting sites, maintains voter registration lists and handles election administration


So, if they are required to purge every 30 days by the SAVE act, and also required to hand over lists to the federal government by the SAVE act, and maintenance of those lists is in the hands of a GOP operator, it will be challenging to garner enough resources to fight the ‘glitches’ that will delete hundreds of thousands from the voter rolls for lame reasons.

North Carolina already had 100,000 people that the GOP tried to disenfranchise based in large part on nonsense, it has taken many months to partial resolve.

The actions by the Republican state auditor (or by the federal government who may inject themselves in this process) won’t need to be defensible; they just need to have a temporary effect that can’t be remedied in 30 days.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The GOP has 53 members and (D)s/(I)s have 47 BumRushDaShow Tuesday #1
Fetterman - pro, Murkowski - no BaronChocula Tuesday #8
Am hoping it is DOA in the Senate BumRushDaShow Wednesday #14
Fetterman has not said he supports it. Wiz Imp Wednesday #20
Jesus Christ, when so many Democrats are against this, Fetterman should NOT even bluestarone Wednesday #34
Filibusters can be initiated by a simple email to the clerk stating the intention to filibuster Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
"This will be the ultimate test of Schumer's leadership." OldBaldy1701E Tuesday #3
What if. after the midterms, the Senate is split 51 D/49R onenote Tuesday #5
Tell me, what legislation is going to be passed with the filibuster intact? Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #7
So you'd hand control over the Senate back to the repubs onenote Wednesday #9
It would be Fetterman handing control to the republicans Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #10
Here is a tracker/scorer for how progressive/conservative our members of Congress are BumRushDaShow Wednesday #16
Fetterman might be a lot of things, but showboater isn't one of them Deminpenn Wednesday #19
"Fetterman might be a lot of things, but showboater isn't one of them" BumRushDaShow Wednesday #30
Fetterman has dressed like that for years Deminpenn Wednesday #40
Oh I know BumRushDaShow Wednesday #42
Casey has said he was not retiring and thus has not ruled out running again. Wiz Imp Wednesday #47
Oh I know like Sherrod Brown BumRushDaShow Wednesday #49
I was very surprised he lost to McCormick, tbh Deminpenn Thursday #54
Casey and Brown got caught up in a "wave" election BumRushDaShow Thursday #55
Seen the video and posted same several times Deminpenn Thursday #53
Thanks Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #22
Thanks. Wiz Imp Wednesday #24
Agree!!! nm mikewv Wednesday #27
That is because Fetterman made himself into a "media sensation" BumRushDaShow Wednesday #31
I believe for tie-breaking it matters how Fetterman votes, not what party he's a member of? Ilikepurple Wednesday #11
For deciding who is the majority leader, it matters a lot. onenote Wednesday #43
Fetterman would never caucus with Republicans Wiz Imp Wednesday #46
If he was ousted from the Democratic caucus and stripped of committee positions onenote Wednesday #50
If the SAVE Act passed the Senate, it would mean at least 8 Democrats voted for it. Wiz Imp Wednesday #21
Unless, as threatened, they change the rules in the filibuster. Nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #23
If they change the rules eliminating the filibuster, then ZERO Democratic votes are needed to Wiz Imp Wednesday #25
Unless more republicans than Murkowski vote No. nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #26
The title of the Post and the article it refers to is "Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes" Wiz Imp Wednesday #28
You apparently missed this: Wiz Imp Wednesday #29
They aren't talking about eliminating it, but changing the rules Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #41
SO? Let them do it. It will fail and make them look like idiots. Wiz Imp Wednesday #44
best of luck to them Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #48
If it is 51/49, Removing Fetterman by any means does not make Vance a tie breaker karynnj Wednesday #33
"Shapiro would call for a special election. So, he would remain at 50/49 for months. " BumRushDaShow Wednesday #36
Thanks for the correction. karynnj Wednesday #37
No problem - I remember that whole period when Heinz had the plane/helicopter accident BumRushDaShow Wednesday #39
Not talking about removing him from the Senate--talking about removing him from the Democratic caucus onenote Wednesday #51
Oh, you are correct. Pushing him out of the caucus is beyond stupid karynnj Wednesday #52
There is ZERO chance of it passing. Wiz Imp Tuesday #4
I recall election night 2016 . . . AverageOldGuy Tuesday #6
This isn't the same situation Karma13612 Wednesday #12
Ridiculous comparison Wiz Imp Wednesday #18
Lots of good info here, but not a ZERO (all capitals?) chance of passing. Ilikepurple Wednesday #13
Behind-the-scenes no_hypocrisy Wednesday #15
I hope Democratic think tanks are working on ways to help people get legitimate IDs if needed. karynnj Wednesday #35
People who move? College students missing their birth certificate? Hispanics with multiple last names? lostnfound Wednesday #45
I was not saying that it would easy to create a workable process, karynnj Thursday #57
Those are good, constructive ideas. In NC, though, the GOP just grabbed election processes for themselves... lostnfound Friday #58
Republicans...destroying our democracy one pillar at a time. travelingthrulife Wednesday #17
So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax? travelingthrulife Wednesday #32
"So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax?" BumRushDaShow Wednesday #38
Nor would their wives be exempt if this were to pass. ProudMNDemocrat Thursday #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's election bill top...»Reply #58