Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes, but Democrats could still block it [View all]lostnfound
(17,462 posts)58. Those are good, constructive ideas. In NC, though, the GOP just grabbed election processes for themselves...
We are stuck playing whack-a-mole against a well-funded GOP intent on undermining democracy no matter what it takes
.instead of having a legitimate opposing party with whom to compromise, collaborate or co-create solutions. (Ha! Laughable, isnt it?)
The previous North Carolina Democratic governor Roy Cooper had stopped an attempt by the red legislature to steal authority for elections for themselves. A court ruling agreed that it needed to stay in the executive branch.
So the GOP changed tactics, and passed a law to put elections in the hands of the state auditor, also republican, but in the executive branch. https://www.courthousenews.com/north-carolina-governor-continues-fight-for-control-of-elections-boards/
After a separate panel of North Carolina Court of Appeals judges stayed the lower courts ruling and allowed the auditor to gain control over appointments until the appeal is resolved or the court issues another decision, Boliek promptly flipped the majority on the state board of elections from Democratic to Republican and replaced the boards executive director with the former general counsel for the speaker of the house.
In addition to the state board of elections, Boliek also gained the ability to appoint members to county election boards, and choose the board chair. Prior to the change, the governor had appointed members to the state board since 1901.
The state GOP has tried several times since 2016 to secure control over the state board of elections, which operates voting sites, maintains voter registration lists and handles election administration
So, if they are required to purge every 30 days by the SAVE act, and also required to hand over lists to the federal government by the SAVE act, and maintenance of those lists is in the hands of a GOP operator, it will be challenging to garner enough resources to fight the glitches that will delete hundreds of thousands from the voter rolls for lame reasons.
North Carolina already had 100,000 people that the GOP tried to disenfranchise based in large part on nonsense, it has taken many months to partial resolve.
The actions by the Republican state auditor (or by the federal government who may inject themselves in this process) wont need to be defensible; they just need to have a temporary effect that cant be remedied in 30 days.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes, but Democrats could still block it [View all]
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Tuesday
OP
Jesus Christ, when so many Democrats are against this, Fetterman should NOT even
bluestarone
Wednesday
#34
Filibusters can be initiated by a simple email to the clerk stating the intention to filibuster
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#2
Tell me, what legislation is going to be passed with the filibuster intact?
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#7
Here is a tracker/scorer for how progressive/conservative our members of Congress are
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
#16
I believe for tie-breaking it matters how Fetterman votes, not what party he's a member of?
Ilikepurple
Wednesday
#11
If he was ousted from the Democratic caucus and stripped of committee positions
onenote
Wednesday
#50
If the SAVE Act passed the Senate, it would mean at least 8 Democrats voted for it.
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#21
If they change the rules eliminating the filibuster, then ZERO Democratic votes are needed to
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#25
The title of the Post and the article it refers to is "Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes"
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#28
If it is 51/49, Removing Fetterman by any means does not make Vance a tie breaker
karynnj
Wednesday
#33
"Shapiro would call for a special election. So, he would remain at 50/49 for months. "
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
#36
No problem - I remember that whole period when Heinz had the plane/helicopter accident
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
#39
Not talking about removing him from the Senate--talking about removing him from the Democratic caucus
onenote
Wednesday
#51
I hope Democratic think tanks are working on ways to help people get legitimate IDs if needed.
karynnj
Wednesday
#35
People who move? College students missing their birth certificate? Hispanics with multiple last names?
lostnfound
Wednesday
#45
Those are good, constructive ideas. In NC, though, the GOP just grabbed election processes for themselves...
lostnfound
Friday
#58
So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax?
travelingthrulife
Wednesday
#32
"So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax?"
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
#38