Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(176,611 posts)
21. Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court allows California congressional map ahead of midterm elections
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 07:53 PM
Yesterday

The high court previously approved Texas’ GOP-friendly map, which California’s Proposition 50 sought to counter.



https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-allows-california-congressional-map-midterm-elections

The Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal from Republicans to halt California’s congressional map, which was passed in response to Texas’ Republican-friendly effort, launched at President Donald Trump’s urging ahead of the November midterm elections.

The high court rejection came Wednesday in an unexplained order with no justices noting dissent.

In December, the Supreme Court approved Texas’ map on the grounds that it was motivated by partisan considerations, which the court has permitted, and not by unlawful racial considerations. When the court sided with Texas, it also seemed to cite California’s effort approvingly. Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion that “the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”

A divided lower-court panel cited the Supreme Court order in the Texas case when it rejected a GOP challenge to California’s map. Republicans appealed to the justices, leading to Wednesday’s order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uh oh, spaghetti-o róisín_dubh Yesterday #1
... BumRushDaShow Yesterday #2
Hahaha that's brilliant róisín_dubh Yesterday #5
ROFL!! calimary Yesterday #11
Yee haw 💪🏻 Miami Blue Yesterday #3
We the People voted for it! That's after we worked hard for the law we voted to suspend. quaint Yesterday #9
Good! 2naSalit Yesterday #4
Can't wait for Issa to be ousted once and for all! BumRushDaShow Yesterday #6
This winner... littlemissmartypants Yesterday #7
Better the devil you know. calimary Yesterday #12
I will never forget this- BumRushDaShow Yesterday #17
Me either, BRDS. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Yesterday #19
I believe Issa said he would move to sdfernando Yesterday #14
Yup BumRushDaShow Yesterday #18
Sorry Texas, but you caan have him. lostincalifornia Yesterday #20
Perhaps in highly flippable Fort Worth? Zambero 4 hrs ago #25
Bye bye, Issa. Here's how to beat him, from an expert on the inland areas in his district. Liberty Belle Yesterday #23
Very hypocritical of timms139 Yesterday #8
Good news orangecrush Yesterday #10
No upgrade on Clarence Thomas'..... SergeStorms Yesterday #13
Their problem is that they already declared that crass, partisan, naked gerrymandering was just fine. Bluetus Yesterday #15
Congratulations Gov. Newsom and California Democrats! FakeNoose Yesterday #16
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court allows California congressional map ahead of midterm elections LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #21
Tough luck Donny boy Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #22
The Texan Republicans are secretly disappointed... Shipwack Yesterday #24
I don't think this was signed, but I would bet $1 million BigDemVoter 4 hrs ago #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Allow New C...»Reply #21