Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,748 posts)
29. Yes. The St. Louis Fed estimates only a net 57k jobs/month (+/- 25k) need to be created, down from the old 150k number
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:37 PM
Friday
Lower Immigration Projections Mean Lower Breakeven Employment Growth Estimates, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 8/28/25
https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2025/aug/lower-immigration-projections-mean-lower-breakeven-employment-growth

In April this year, St. Louis Fed economist Victoria Gregory and I provided an estimate for breakeven employment growth—the number of jobs the economy needs to add each month to keep the unemployment rate steady. Using Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections from January, we estimated that the U.S. economy needed to add more than 150,000 jobs per month to maintain a stable unemployment rate.1

Since then, new immigration projections have dramatically changed the picture. The bottom line: With much lower expected immigration for 2025, I now estimate breakeven employment growth has fallen to a range between 32,000 and 82,000 jobs per month. ((that's 57k +/- 25k -progree))


As for today's report of 50k net new payroll jobs, while unemployment rate ticked down 0.1 percentage points, 3 reasons:

1./ The above


2./ The 2 numbers come from different surveys -- the 50k number comes from the Establishment Survey, while the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate come from the Household Survey. The payroll jobs number sampling error: +/- 136,000 at 90% confidence interval And the unemployed numbers are +/- 300,000 (and +/- 0.2% for the unemployment rate).
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.tn.htm
Note, this is just the sampling error. There are other errors besides sampling error.

Correspondingly, again based on sampling error alone, there is a 50% chance that it is within +/- 55,800, and a 50% chance that it is outside that. So, for example for a reported job gain of 100,000, there is a 50% chance that it is between 44,200 and 155,800, and a 50% chance that it is outside that range based on sampling error alone. Note there are errors other than sampling error that add to the uncertainty


3./ As BRDS said, the labor force participation rate is a big factor in changing the unemployment rate. The labor force fell by 46k in December.
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The jackass has created a no fire no hire economy in the private sector. lostincalifornia Friday #1
4.4% unemployment while the U.S. economy is losing jobs? NoMoreRepugs Friday #2
I know progree will be around shortly but I think one factor is the "Labor Participation Rate" BumRushDaShow Friday #3
#29 a little ways below /nt progree Friday #30
... BumRushDaShow Friday #31
could be an effect of mass deportations DBoon Friday #15
Yes. The St. Louis Fed estimates only a net 57k jobs/month (+/- 25k) need to be created, down from the old 150k number progree Friday #29
Actually nonfarm payroll employment FELL by 192,000, but were seasonally adjusted upwards to +50,000 progree Friday #4
Mostly temp jobs, am I right? FakeNoose Friday #5
Not necessarily. UPS, FedEx & Amazon increases are accounted for by the Seasonal Adjustment. Wiz Imp Friday #7
I'm guessing all the hirng.... SergeStorms Friday #26
Looking at the graph Johnny2X2X Friday #6
The October massive drop (fed "Fork in the Road" disaster) BumRushDaShow Friday #8
Under Biden Johnny2X2X Friday #9
This tells it all BumRushDaShow Friday #12
"this tells it all" - yes it does. I like that it's percent change, and that it is annualized progree Friday #20
Brilliant! Thanks wolfie001 Friday #21
striking Skittles Friday #27
Yes. April level 159433. December 159526 Wiz Imp Friday #10
11,625 jobs a month! Johnny2X2X Friday #16
Yeah, no. I'm not buying it. Texin Friday #11
Aaron Rupar's video clips of administration talking heads trying to change the subject: mahatmakanejeeves Friday #13
This one? BumRushDaShow Friday #18
That smarmy imp puts the ass in Hassett peppertree Friday #22
Data is from the BLS - already gutted of intelligent people by pres dump. mdbl Friday #14
That - or he has his "supervisors" keep an eye on them numbers peppertree Friday #23
Links to data series progree Friday #17
Both payroll employment (+50,000) and unemployment rate (4.4%) change little in December mahatmakanejeeves Friday #19
and in a couple of months, it will be revised down further as seems to be the case. nt Javaman Friday #24
They already had some revisions downward of previous data! BumRushDaShow Friday #25
Compare to Wednesday's ADP report of PRIVATE payrolls: ADP: +41k, BLS: +37k progree Friday #28
Benchmark jobs data will be released with the next monthly release at the beginning of February. Wiz Imp Friday #32
🚨 President Literal Asswipe posted job numbers from the report the evening before 😬! progree Friday #33
"if you REALLY want to be first with the jobs report, check Truth Social the night before" BumRushDaShow Friday #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. payrolls rose 50,000...»Reply #29