Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Na na na na hey hey goodbye! Ritabert Jan 7 #1
Well sheshe2 Jan 7 #2
All of the privileges of living in the US which helped him get so rich. Irish_Dem Jan 7 #3
This won't affect his federal taxes, only his state taxes Jose Garcia Jan 7 #13
ha. he probably doesn't pay federal taxes. Irish_Dem Jan 7 #15
Probably gets DiverDave Jan 8 #56
Yep subsidies from the US taxpayer. Irish_Dem Jan 8 #57
"It worked!" say Californians as they high-five eachother. Scrivener7 Jan 7 #4
Now Deleware should implement a billionaire tax. Good riddance, asshole. kysrsoze Jan 7 #5
Deleware should charge a wealth tax Puppyjive Jan 7 #6
Unlikely Deep State Witch Jan 7 #16
Corporate law is one of the major things that needs to be re-done if the US is ever BComplex Jan 7 #28
We money spending consumers bake the economic cookies, the rich eat most of them and leave us the crumbs. nt Exp Jan 7 #7
A wealth tax to fund healthcare Bayard Jan 7 #8
They should charge him a leaving tax Mr. Sparkle Jan 7 #9
LOL!! Brilliant!! BComplex Jan 7 #29
It's a double edged sword The Grand Illuminist Jan 7 #10
It's been working out well in Massachusetts, which actually has more millionaires now TheRickles Jan 7 #22
Totally different, not the same at all. Abolishinist Jan 8 #50
True, but they're both aiming for the same redistributive goals, though via different means. TheRickles Jan 8 #55
Regadless of when he left, if the wealth tax is approved he will have to pay because it is retroactive to 1/1/25 and in2herbs Jan 7 #11
The Constitution specifically prohibits states from passing retroactive laws Jose Garcia Jan 7 #14
With regards to criminal laws, yes, but not with regards to civil laws. See below: in2herbs Jan 7 #33
Good riddance. Martin68 Jan 7 #12
Killing the goose that lays the golden eggs The Mouth Jan 7 #17
Check the tax rates under Reagan Easterncedar Jan 7 #19
The problem is that the rich can just up and move The Mouth Jan 7 #47
That makes corporations sound like they are necessarily benefitting their State in kind. BComplex Jan 7 #30
The Laffer Curve was debunked long ago DBoon Jan 7 #43
Wealth is mobile The Mouth Jan 7 #48
The Laffer Curve proposed that lowering taxes creates overall economic prosperity DBoon Jan 8 #52
I didn't quote, or refer to the Laffer curve, that was someone else The Mouth Jan 8 #61
How fucking greedy can you get? Ray Bruns Jan 7 #18
These money-hoarders have an addiction to money. MLWR Jan 7 #20
I think the oldigarchs addiction to money and power is because they will soon be dead , afraid their power will wane, in2herbs Jan 7 #34
Not dead fast enough. diane in sf Jan 7 #38
I agree! nt in2herbs Jan 7 #39
It is game to the super rich SheLiberal Jan 7 #41
Welp Pas-de-Calais Jan 7 #21
Oh, boo, hoo, hoo... Pay your damn fair share... electric_blue68 Jan 7 #23
Thanks California for helping us become billionaires Smilo Jan 7 #24
Hahaha! One more billionaire mansion in Texas they can't sell. Joinfortmill Jan 7 #25
Isnt Gavin Newsome against this tax? Callie1979 Jan 7 #26
Ballot Analysis of Initiative 2025-024 quaint Jan 7 #27
Page moved, but the major companies of Alphabet haven't. CA may be a little tax poorer, but not enough to affect ancianita Jan 7 #31
If you sleep on someone's couch and you don't pay rent, you're a moocher. Initech Jan 8 #58
I hear you. ancianita Jan 8 #59
Link to text of initiative, California Secretary of State office GJGCA Jan 7 #32
The sun in California shines a bit brighter today Sweet Rosie Red Jan 7 #35
Bye, Felicia. QueerDuck Jan 7 #36
Welp lonely bird Jan 7 #37
The greed and selfishness of these people are beyond belief. Mebbe I'm wrong, but I don't think Larry is going to end up Fil1957 Jan 7 #40
You don't own California. You don't own the people of this state. DBoon Jan 7 #42
Come on! The man's gotta eat. Swede Jan 7 #44
Make these assholes pay! They can't keep mooching forever! Initech Jan 7 #45
Tech billionaires have contempt for everyone not in their class DBoon Jan 7 #46
Page is moving because, after the new tax, he'd ONLY have 256,500,000,000 dollars? LudwigPastorius Jan 8 #49
Bye RandySF Jan 8 #51
He SHOULD be shamed as one of the greediest men in the world by every lawmaker and every media outlet. Doodley Jan 8 #53
Good UpInArms Jan 8 #54
Instead of a wealth tax.... Happy Hoosier Jan 8 #60
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Google co-founder leaves ...»Reply #26