Latest Breaking News

snot

(11,528 posts)

6. I've read that the NYT & WaPo

Tue Jan 6, 2026, 06:44 PM

Tuesday

had advance notice of the operation but refrained from reporting on it, supposedly out of concern for the troops' safety (although I have to say, it seems like they never met a military operation they didn't love reporting on, and this one might not have happened had more people known what was planned).

So yes, there were probably a number of people who might have had inside info.

Trump's own behavior illustrates perfectly why profiting from inside info, whether you're the pres., a congresscritter, or whatever – should be illegal and prosecuted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anonymous crypto gambler made $436,000 on Maduro capture [View all] Mr. Sparkle Tuesday OP

tRUMP the fat orange imbecile and his corrupt cohort of criminals wolfie001 Tuesday #1

Junior, is that you? Brother Buzz Tuesday #2

Or just a wise individual following the Epstein deadlines. gAI Obsession Tuesday #3

Ah Yes, crypto - where crooks go to launder money. mdbl Tuesday #4

As I said on the first thread about this, it could have been anybody who knew the attack was coming William Seger Tuesday #5

I've read that the NYT & WaPo snot Tuesday #6

But if it's a reporter or somebody close to a reporter that had the inside info, Igel Tuesday #8

I think the law prohibits trading on non-public info, snot Wednesday #9

From The Atlantic PSPS Tuesday #7