Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Aussie105

(7,572 posts)

17. We already have examples of computer aided 'reality' presentations.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Dec 28, 2025, 02:08 AM

10 hrs ago

Deep fakes, where a politician says 'things' the real person never would.

Nigerian scammers 'disguised' as locals with deep fake technology.

Teenage boys putting the head of a female classmate on the naked body of a porn star, for shits&giggles.

Video 'reviews' of new car models that don't exist in the real world.

All the above makes me NOT want to see the new Avatar movie!

Once the AI investors realise their money won't be multiplied and returned to them, what is next?
More of the above?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An AI pioneer says the technology is 'limited' and won't replace humans anytime soon [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

If it don't make pizza, it ain't worth nothing. /nt bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1

Might I add that you can only divide the pie of potential users so far. There is no way all of these data flashman13 Yesterday #2

In the end I think what you'll see is Amazo, Microsoft and Google be the dominant three. cstanleytech Yesterday #4

In the end the big guys will gobble up everyone else for pennies on the dollar. flashman13 Yesterday #5

Well I got agree there as when it comes to writing they are extremely limited. cstanleytech Yesterday #3

Yep. not fooled 22 hrs ago #7

Even it's factual questions can be flawed so you should always verify as some Trump lawyers are learning right now. cstanleytech 20 hrs ago #14

So don't use AI for writing. Anything you write with it isn't your work anyway and can't be copyrighted. highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #11

I don't, I have tested it out though and it's just not at the point where it'll replace a human being. cstanleytech 20 hrs ago #13

One serious limit: AI bots are completely incapable of actual logic William Seger 23 hrs ago #6

While he's correct, it doesn't matter. Shipwack 22 hrs ago #8

AI isn't really that much intelligence (for now at least), it is automation on steroids ToxMarz 21 hrs ago #9

I heard the same thing from an industry insider mdbl 21 hrs ago #10

The venture capital bubble may burst, but that's not going to stop the research. LudwigPastorius 20 hrs ago #12

That article is nothing but pro-AI hype from someone incapable of being objective about AI. He's highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #15

I totally agree. When the IT revolution rolled in during the late 60s, early 70s/80s, we were just seeing the beginning SWBTATTReg 17 hrs ago #16

We already have examples of computer aided 'reality' presentations. Aussie105 10 hrs ago #17

The only benefit I can see from any of this is to the employers FakeNoose 2 hrs ago #18

One setting of Ara does indeed talk back Polybius 1 hr ago #19

Company owners and bosses don't use that setting FakeNoose 11 min ago #20