Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cstanleytech

(28,191 posts)

3. Well I got agree there as when it comes to writing they are extremely limited.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat Dec 27, 2025, 11:47 AM

Yesterday

For example if you try one for say writing a story or something it'll initially be okay but as precedes it starts to lose track of character relationships, past events and even the storyline.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An AI pioneer says the technology is 'limited' and won't replace humans anytime soon [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

If it don't make pizza, it ain't worth nothing. /nt bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1

Might I add that you can only divide the pie of potential users so far. There is no way all of these data flashman13 Yesterday #2

In the end I think what you'll see is Amazo, Microsoft and Google be the dominant three. cstanleytech Yesterday #4

In the end the big guys will gobble up everyone else for pennies on the dollar. flashman13 Yesterday #5

Well I got agree there as when it comes to writing they are extremely limited. cstanleytech Yesterday #3

Yep. not fooled Yesterday #7

Even it's factual questions can be flawed so you should always verify as some Trump lawyers are learning right now. cstanleytech 22 hrs ago #14

So don't use AI for writing. Anything you write with it isn't your work anyway and can't be copyrighted. highplainsdem 22 hrs ago #11

I don't, I have tested it out though and it's just not at the point where it'll replace a human being. cstanleytech 22 hrs ago #13

One serious limit: AI bots are completely incapable of actual logic William Seger Yesterday #6

While he's correct, it doesn't matter. Shipwack Yesterday #8

AI isn't really that much intelligence (for now at least), it is automation on steroids ToxMarz Yesterday #9

I heard the same thing from an industry insider mdbl 23 hrs ago #10

The venture capital bubble may burst, but that's not going to stop the research. LudwigPastorius 22 hrs ago #12

That article is nothing but pro-AI hype from someone incapable of being objective about AI. He's highplainsdem 22 hrs ago #15

I totally agree. When the IT revolution rolled in during the late 60s, early 70s/80s, we were just seeing the beginning SWBTATTReg 19 hrs ago #16

We already have examples of computer aided 'reality' presentations. Aussie105 12 hrs ago #17

The only benefit I can see from any of this is to the employers FakeNoose 5 hrs ago #18

One setting of Ara does indeed talk back Polybius 3 hrs ago #19

Company owners and bosses don't use that setting FakeNoose 2 hrs ago #20

Yep, that's true Polybius 1 hr ago #21