Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: President unveils new 'Trump class' fleet of battleships [View all]AverageOldGuy
(3,279 posts)5. The American shipbuilding industry is on life support and cannot produce these ships . . . or any other ship
https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/why-cant-the-us-build-ships
Trump is an idiot. I can hear the groans from the Navy, especially after Hogsbreath announces that, yes, the Navy will build battleships.
Battleships went the way of dinosaurs with the introduction of the carrier -- the battleship is nothing but a target today.
Even if the Navy decides to go this route, and if Congress agrees, it will be ten years before the first keel is laid and another 5-7 years before the first is launched. Never happen.
Year End Orders for Large Oceangoing Ships
Number of ships.
Shipbuilder 2022 2021 2020
China 1,794 1,708 1,216
South Korea 734 626 441
Japan 587 612 533
Europe 319 288 284
United States 5 3 4
Number of ships.
Shipbuilder 2022 2021 2020
China 1,794 1,708 1,216
South Korea 734 626 441
Japan 587 612 533
Europe 319 288 284
United States 5 3 4
Trump is an idiot. I can hear the groans from the Navy, especially after Hogsbreath announces that, yes, the Navy will build battleships.
Battleships went the way of dinosaurs with the introduction of the carrier -- the battleship is nothing but a target today.
Even if the Navy decides to go this route, and if Congress agrees, it will be ten years before the first keel is laid and another 5-7 years before the first is launched. Never happen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
17 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The American shipbuilding industry is on life support and cannot produce these ships . . . or any other ship
AverageOldGuy
Monday
#5
No. The Iowa-class battleships were the last battleships the United States ever put to sea.
Aristus
Tuesday
#59
Thankfully the Fascist Felon will be dead before any of this sees the light of day.
Dulcinea
Tuesday
#53
Gosh. Which hostile foreign power to whom Trump is indebted would benefit from this?
Orrex
Monday
#18
The Battleship became obsolete on December 7th, 1941, but that fact seems to have escaped
Jack Valentino
Monday
#30
I'm not sure that's totally true, especially in shore bombardment, but carriers had become much more important by then.
Gore1FL
Monday
#33
The way the navy does it is the class is named for the christened name of the 1st ship.
JohnnyRingo
Monday
#39
He is bringing chaos to the Navy. No one is saying how dangerous this could be.
thought crime
Yesterday
#67
Doesn't congress have to approve the expenditure? Or is this like the $40 billion Argentina
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Tuesday
#47
Battleships are nothing more than money-traps and vanity pieces for a 21st century leader
Torchlight
Tuesday
#56
MaddowBlog-Trump names battleship class after himself, advancing his personalization crusade
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
#65