Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,178 posts)
4. "If the SCOTUS wants to go officially on record protecting a child rapist, then let them."
Mon Dec 22, 2025, 03:40 PM
Monday

They already HAVE, time and time again. That's why his ass isn't in jail today.

"Daddy John Roberts" made sure that he would NEVER go on trial for January 6 by conferring what he claimed was "qualified immunity" but was a wink wink "universal 'immunity'", so all he has to do is claim he was doing something that was "part of his official duties", even if that is complete bullshit.

I definitely agree with "fighting fire with fire", but we need to GET some fire source first, and at this point, it may be up to the blue states (right now the only cases still "alive" with convictions and/or liabilities, ARE the NY state cases - Bragg's (which is criminal fraud) & James' (civil fraud), along with E. Jean Carroll's multiple civil cases.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't question Miguelito Loveless Monday #1
"Prosecute." BumRushDaShow Monday #2
If the SCOTUS Miguelito Loveless Monday #3
"If the SCOTUS wants to go officially on record protecting a child rapist, then let them." BumRushDaShow Monday #4
They have granted him immunity Miguelito Loveless Monday #5
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Democrats Question ...»Reply #4