Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

slightlv

(7,396 posts)

3. If it brings in money and profit, why wouldn't they?

Reply to Irish_Dem (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 09:06 PM

Friday

They have no morals; they have no duty to their shareholders in that way... only to bring in as much money for them as is possible. I think it's totally detestable from every angle you look at it... but I don't see any other way they could have done what they did for as many years as they enabled him, and not think it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

travelingthrulife

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Epstein money trail: Lawsuits claim major banks enabled Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking finances [View all] BumRushDaShow Friday OP

His picture will be turned to the wall. hedda_foil Friday #1

Why would banks fund child sex trafficking? Irish_Dem Friday #2

If it brings in money and profit, why wouldn't they? slightlv Friday #3

A good investment and the bankers are part of the sex ring. Irish_Dem Friday #4

Yip, dream all we want... slightlv Friday #5

Could he have been taping porn? Rape Porn. Irish_Dem Saturday #8

They were cash transactions, and there were supposed to be SARS written up for each one FakeNoose Friday #6

Yes but we can speculate. Why would a bank refuse to do SARs? Irish_Dem Saturday #7

Deutsch Bank. Let's see how Trump financed the sex trafficking business. travelingthrulife Saturday #9