Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SSJVegeta

(2,240 posts)

15. Excellent point!

Reply to sheshe2 (Reply #11)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 05:21 PM

Dec 5

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

JUST IN: Judge Unseals Epstein Grand Jury Documents [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 5 OP

Do you think the government expected this decision? SSJVegeta Dec 5 #1

I hope not. greatauntoftriplets Dec 5 #2

I feel like they were doing it specifixally because they didnt think it would happen. SSJVegeta Dec 5 #7

Tariffman was looking at this with his horse blinders on KS Toronado Dec 5 #12

Can "The Supremes" check in and overturn it? SergeStorms Dec 6 #43

I'm sure they did. They asked for it. It's a Rick Scott/Trump judge onenote Dec 5 #17

They believed it would be treated like a subpoena. pat_k Dec 5 #21

The loophole is the word "unclassified". nt moniss Dec 5 #3

There you go... Bayard Dec 5 #13

He can declassify it with his brain PuraVidaDreamin Dec 5 #14

"unclassified" is from the language of the transparency act. pat_k Dec 5 #22

Yes and my point is that word can be used as some things moniss Dec 5 #33

Yes, I have no doubt they'll try it. Fortunately, classification of documents is subject to judicial review. pat_k Dec 5 #34

In the case of the moniss Dec 5 #37

Yep. pat_k Dec 5 #38

I think the GQP members who moniss Dec 5 #39

Classification of documents is subject to judicial review. pat_k Dec 5 #23

I expect this crowd to use moniss Dec 5 #35

Oh yeah. I expect the cornered beasts to keep violating law at every turn on this. pat_k Dec 5 #40

Yes I wouldn't be surprised moniss Dec 6 #42

K & R...... Lovie777 Dec 5 #4

Oh lordy Ouroborosnek Dec 5 #5

Didn't the WH say they were fine with this, already? It's not likely there's a lot of detail, not likely others are wiggs Dec 5 #6

I remember TrumpCo. offered to release some shit like this a while back, but there is really nothing in it hadEnuf Dec 5 #8

Nothing new here duckworth969 Dec 5 #9

Exactly. liberalla Dec 6 #44

The Grand Jury documents are a subset of all that the Justice Department has on the case. patphil Dec 5 #10

It is going to have a lot about Maxwell as well. sheshe2 Dec 5 #11

Excellent point! SSJVegeta Dec 5 #15

Thanks! sheshe2 Dec 5 #18

And don't they specifically exclude information about trump? Scrivener7 Dec 5 #20

The Guardians Of Pedofelon (GOP) in the WH & DoJ will make sure... Justice matters. Dec 5 #24

see above post NJCher Dec 5 #28

Pedonold will classify all that his name is in, then... Justice matters. Dec 5 #32

Months? NJCher Dec 5 #41

I want to see the financial records. travelingthrulife Dec 5 #16

CLASSIFIED (top secret) nt Justice matters. Dec 5 #25

Don't be surprised if you are disappointed. May be a distraction from real information Raven123 Dec 5 #19

Nothing will come of this. J_William_Ryan Dec 5 #26

Those are not the files that are supposed to be released, by law Iwasthere Dec 5 #27

I can imagine that anything/everything popsdenver Dec 5 #29

What they have released so far LilElf70 Dec 5 #30

probably will be heavily redacted. AllaN01Bear Dec 5 #31

The grand jury documents will likely have very little if any information about Wiz Imp Dec 5 #36