Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

xocetaceans

(4,338 posts)

8. So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? What . . .

Reply to TheRickles (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 11:31 AM

Dec 5

. . . gives you such confidence in that ability and what about the other "miniscule [sic]" numbers of transmission cases? Do you think that those are transmissions are fine?

Out of about 3,600,000 newborns per year in the US, how many constitute that minuscule number of transmissions that you would accept and tolerate as fine? What do you wish on them in lieu of a safe and effective vaccination against such an eminently avoidable disease?

RFK, Jr. is not correct and is wholly unqualified and is pathetically incompetent as the leader of HHS.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SunSeeker

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US vaccine advisers say not all babies need a hepatitis B shot at birth [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 5 OP

Illinois has enacted snowybirdie Dec 5 #1

Parents should demand their pediatricians follow the Illinois vaccination schedule. FarPoint Dec 5 #3

There are a couple "regional" health alliances/colaboratives BumRushDaShow Dec 5 #5

And yet he might be right about this one. TheRickles Dec 5 #2

Agree on this one vaccine- totally unnecessary unless the mother was at risk as a drug abuser biophile Dec 5 #4

So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? xocetaceans Dec 5 #10

No, it's not for me personally to decide biophile Dec 5 #12

To be clearer, my post indicates that the knowledge a person needs to have in order to carry out what you seem . . . xocetaceans Dec 6 #21

Definitely not a libertarian or anti-vax; no ax to grind biophile Dec 6 #22

Some HepB + mothers aren't tested. Or they have false-negative results. mainer Dec 5 #6

Asian Americans are at higher risk. deurbano Dec 5 #7

So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? What . . . xocetaceans Dec 5 #8

Utter hogwash. You don't know what you're talking about. PSPS Dec 5 #13

Wait a minute... maybe I misunderstood you... slightlv Dec 5 #16

What damage does giving every baby the Hep B vaccine cause? NickB79 Dec 5 #20

I should say that Magatry is a murder-suicide cult. ananda Dec 5 #9

I think waiting till babies are older is a good idea womanofthehills Dec 5 #11

Oh, please. The liver damage can already be happeinig before babies "are older." PSPS Dec 5 #14

Fevers are scary. But they are only one indicator in a myriad of symptoms used to diagnose problems. ... littlemissmartypants Dec 5 #17

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a baby killer. nt SunSeeker Dec 5 #15

So which ones will need it then? mdbl Dec 5 #18

In a brutal week for public health, the chairman on the Senate health committee could act. So why doesn't he? https://bs LetMyPeopleVote Dec 5 #19