Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ancianita

(42,744 posts)

6. Because he wants to pass SOMETHING that's bipartisan. He's is doing the wrong thing for the right reason.

Reply to delisen (Reply #5)

Wed Apr 2, 2025, 12:40 PM

Apr 2025

Picking on Section 230 is dumb, and it's just the thing that appeases power hungry rethugs so that Trump can go after platforms for 3rd party content. It's an unwise attempt at bipartisanship.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senators revive efforts to strip tech companies of key legal protection [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 OP

Snapshot of our country - MAGA/Fox News think 230 is a restriction on free speech underpants Apr 2025 #1

they have perfected et tu Apr 2025 #3

Eliminating Section 230 is yet another Project 2025 deliverable under "reforming" the FCC and reining in big tech. Eugene Apr 2025 #2

If ANY bill is referenced in Proj. 2025, neither Durbin nor ANY Democrat should sponsor. Bipartisanship ancianita Apr 2025 #8

Without this protection, close censorship of content would surely result. andym Apr 2025 #4

Why is Dick Durbin sponsoring this? nt delisen Apr 2025 #5

Because he wants to pass SOMETHING that's bipartisan. He's is doing the wrong thing for the right reason. ancianita Apr 2025 #6

From TechdirtTo Durbin & Graham: "Hello! You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong About Section 230 ... ancianita Apr 2025 #7