Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

underpants

(190,180 posts)

1. Snapshot of our country - MAGA/Fox News think 230 is a restriction on free speech

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Apr 2, 2025, 11:13 AM

Apr 2

Last edited Wed Apr 2, 2025, 11:59 AM - Edit history (1)

Before Elon bought Twitter and Zuck tried to plead his way into oligarch protection, it was a big talking point with them. Trump used to talk about it all the time.

Completely opposite of what it is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senators revive efforts to strip tech companies of key legal protection [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 2 OP

Snapshot of our country - MAGA/Fox News think 230 is a restriction on free speech underpants Apr 2 #1

they have perfected et tu Apr 2 #3

Eliminating Section 230 is yet another Project 2025 deliverable under "reforming" the FCC and reining in big tech. Eugene Apr 2 #2

If ANY bill is referenced in Proj. 2025, neither Durbin nor ANY Democrat should sponsor. Bipartisanship ancianita Apr 2 #8

Without this protection, close censorship of content would surely result. andym Apr 2 #4

Why is Dick Durbin sponsoring this? nt delisen Apr 2 #5

Because he wants to pass SOMETHING that's bipartisan. He's is doing the wrong thing for the right reason. ancianita Apr 2 #6

From TechdirtTo Durbin & Graham: "Hello! You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong About Section 230 ... ancianita Apr 2 #7