Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

neohippie

(1,258 posts)

9. They were not part of the lawsuit

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 27, 2025, 06:34 AM

Mar 2025

The judge stated that since only those states were members of the lawsuit that he was concerned about making the ruling nationwide but also said that didn't mean he wasn't considering it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US judge questions his power to reinstate federal workers nationwide [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

Why would a federal judge restrict (discriminate against) fired federal workers no_hypocrisy Mar 2025 #1

Because of precedent. nt pnwmom Mar 2025 #3

Point taken. no_hypocrisy Mar 2025 #4

If course it is. Unfortunately, the more rural states seem to be fine with that. nt pnwmom Mar 2025 #5

They were not part of the lawsuit neohippie Mar 2025 #9

Or he could just apply it to the 19 states and let the politicians in the remaining states face the consequences. nt pnwmom Mar 2025 #2

There are purple states like PA BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #6

Dead On Point MayReasonRule Mar 2025 #12

And Trump questions the power of any federal judge to make him do anything. elocs Mar 2025 #7

You might recall a couple years ago when the state of Alabama ignored a SCOTUS decision BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #8

Although hopeful, that was then and this is now. elocs Mar 2025 #10

Well what was interesting about that AL case BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #11