Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Speaker Mike Johnson floats eliminating federal courts as GOP ramps up attacks on judges [View all]3825-87867
(1,365 posts)and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
Two key words open for reinterpretation - "inferior" plus "and"
Just like their reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment to not only allow tramp on a ballot, but give him immunity, those two words might be a problem.
First off, what is the constitutional definition of Inferior courts?
Secondly, does the comma preclude the Congress from dissolving the SCOTUS also? Reading the statement as Congress may ordain and establish (also remove?), it may read that interpretation could include removing the SCOTUS!
Don't believe it? Remember the 14th and the problems that caused.
I could interpret that as allowing the Congress to do what it will with "inferior courts" AND the SCOTUS -
"Invested in one Supreme Court AND in such inferior courts as the Congress may...
I'm sure they can't, But I was also sure tramp couldn't be on the ballot and the current pres doesn't have immunity from whatever.
Pretty sure how Roberts et al will rule on that one. Ok for we, but them ain't us.
Edit history
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):