Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

mike_c

(36,905 posts)

10. who would arrest him?

Reply to Sanity Claws (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 17, 2025, 01:13 PM

Mar 2025

The Congress creates the laws, the Judiciary interprets them, and the Executive enforces them. At the federal level, who has the power to arrest and hold perpetrators but officers of the Executive branch? They all work for the orange shit-gibbon and his minions now. I don't even think the Supreme Court will be able to rein him in if he loses in court. Who would they send to arrest him if he ignores their orders? He'd have to be impeached and removed from office first.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

republianmushroom sop

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's border czar: "I don't care what the judges think" [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

Jail him for contempt of court Sanity Claws Mar 2025 #1

who would arrest him? mike_c Mar 2025 #10

since laws dont matter have local cops do it moonshinegnomie Mar 2025 #16

Same people who would kacekwl Mar 2025 #27

that's just it mike_c Mar 2025 #28

Regardless of what he might think* he doesn't have "presidential immunity." MLWR Mar 2025 #15

HE needs his ass pulled in undere oath! bluestarone Mar 2025 #2

Even under oath, he'll lie sakabatou Mar 2025 #30

There you have it: the 3rd branch of Gubmint is rendered moot. maxsolomon Mar 2025 #3

Right. What judges think is for lawyers and appeal judges to think about. A court order is a lawful order Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2025 #7

Only if they are enforced, so far they haven't been enforced. republianmushroom Mar 2025 #21

Lack of enforcement does not negate the legality of the order. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2025 #22

Without enforcement orders is means squat. republianmushroom Mar 2025 #23

Logically, that is a separate issue. Unrelated to legality. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2025 #24

Justice Department defends deportation flights, telling judge that his oral order "is not enforceable" republianmushroom Mar 2025 #25

"not enforceable" is not "illegal". I don't know why you are having difficulty understanding the logical distinction.nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2025 #26

He really should care johnnyfins Mar 2025 #4

I wouldn't bet on that. republianmushroom Mar 2025 #20

You're prolly right. Wishful thinking I guess johnnyfins Mar 2025 #29

Why are these judges all bark but no bite?? Omnipresent Mar 2025 #5

They have "heard it all" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #9

Who is going to hold them accountable? IronLionZion Mar 2025 #6

No laws for the cheeto tyrant and his minions. Solly Mack Mar 2025 #8

How long until American citizens are labeled as "dangerous terrorists"? Docreed2003 Mar 2025 #11

trump is already doing that, practically every day, slightlv Mar 2025 #14

What a piece bdamomma Mar 2025 #12

I just want some judge to actually call these bastards to a court room. (IF they don't show, go through the process) bluestarone Mar 2025 #13

He sounds nuts in interviews. A complete thug. nt Exp Mar 2025 #17

Is it time for pitchforks & torches yet? rickyhall Mar 2025 #18

The thinking of all of the convicted felon's administration. republianmushroom Mar 2025 #19