Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(194,945 posts)
1. So they quickly fired people then claimed there was a review
Sun Mar 16, 2025, 04:07 PM
Mar 2025

but complained about the rapid rate of litigation

“Defendants refused to make any further effort to get at the truth, arguing that the only way forward was to wait on them to produce their administrative record, and ‘for gaps in that record to be litigated, to be supplemented by oral testimony, if necessary,'” Alsup said. “Defendants otherwise complained that the rapid pace of litigation prohibited the production of anything more than the Ezell declaration. It is again surprising, then, that defendants managed (in the span of a single day) to muster a half-dozen declarations from relief defendants. None of these declarations, or the facts therein, were made available to the Court during its consideration of the TRO or PI now in place. This is a last-ditch attempt to relitigate those orders on a new, untested record.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge slams Trump DOJ for...»Reply #1