Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Polybius

(21,518 posts)

19. Because it was easier to ask you

Reply to SnoopDog (Reply #18)

Sun Mar 16, 2025, 02:29 PM

Mar 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EllieBC

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump administration deports hundreds of migrants even as judge orders that removals be stopped [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

This. Is. Bad. tonkatoy8888 Mar 2025 #1

THIS is a Constitutional crisis, right the f*ck now. NotHardly Mar 2025 #4

No. It's. Not. -- executive is not obligated to follow an unconstitutional judicial order cadoman Mar 2025 #5

Who says it's and 'unconstitutional judicial order'? SnoopDog Mar 2025 #9

Honest question: What was illegal about the deportation of the "Venezuelan gang members?" Polybius Mar 2025 #14

Why don't you look it up yourself? SnoopDog Mar 2025 #18

Because it was easier to ask you Polybius Mar 2025 #19

What was "illegal" was the use of the "Alien Enemies Act of 1798" to do it BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #20

Thank you for answering me BumRush! Polybius Mar 2025 #21

When I saw saw your reply, I was literally listening to a local news radio report on this very subject BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #23

The Judicial Branch Decides What Is Constitutional MayReasonRule Mar 2025 #13

While your intent may be laudable your understanding of the legal case at hand and moniss Mar 2025 #16

an act of war isn't necessary to invoke the act, see below cadoman Mar 2025 #25

Let's cut the crap of accepting that just because they moniss Mar 2025 #26

What foreign nation or government would that be, exactly? NickB79 Mar 2025 #29

that is essentially what the EO asserts, it uses the term "hybrid criminal state" (nt) cadoman Mar 2025 #31

I don't believe they are all gang members any more than I believe "their eating the cats and dogs". Cobalt Violet Mar 2025 #24

what gives him the power to unilaterally deport undocumented migrants? cadoman Mar 2025 #2

"It would be a mistake to use our political capital protecting TdA terrorists" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #3

you do know that the ACLU battled a far more extreme use of this power and lost, right? cadoman Mar 2025 #7

Again BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #15

I was referencing sentiment from forum threads, bsky, etc. cadoman Mar 2025 #27

DU is just a "discussion board" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #28

appreciate that cadoman Mar 2025 #32

But you cannot ignore what was in your highlighted section BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #35

agree, and the plaintiffs will have to prove that TdA is an independent org from Venezuela cadoman Mar 2025 #37

If my memory is correct tonkatoy8888 Mar 2025 #8

we have a shit-ton of overcrowded and poorly-funded facilities that desperately need to be improved cadoman Mar 2025 #10

How to convince low information voters Dumpy Mar 2025 #6

Laken Riley agrees! Sea Turtle Mar 2025 #33

Remember all the Do-gooders and garland apologists here? 3825-87867 Mar 2025 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author ancianita Mar 2025 #12

Jail time for whom judge ? republianmushroom Mar 2025 #17

Is there any real proof these are gang members? Cobalt Violet Mar 2025 #22

Doesn't matter how anyone "feels" about it stoned Mar 2025 #30

The problem -AGAIN- is the use of the authority from the "Alien Enemies Act of 1798" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #34

Post removed Post removed Mar 2025 #36