Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(166,002 posts)

15. Again

Sun Mar 16, 2025, 02:16 PM

Mar 2025

You have attributed to "Democrats" regarding this situation, something that is being challenged by ORGANIZATIONS.

The ACLU is not "Democrats". In fact, on many occasions - particularly for First Amendment issues - the ACLU has gone AFTER Democrats. The link that you provide is against a "Democrat" back under Obama.

Not sure why that is not clicking.

The (Democratic) state AGs have been systematically filing suits against this administration regarding its illegal and unconstitutional activities with respect to the illegal buyout offers, suspensions and firing of employees. Perhaps focus on THAT when you say "Democrats".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

cadoman Rhiannon12866

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump administration deports hundreds of migrants even as judge orders that removals be stopped [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

This. Is. Bad. tonkatoy8888 Mar 2025 #1

THIS is a Constitutional crisis, right the f*ck now. NotHardly Mar 2025 #4

No. It's. Not. -- executive is not obligated to follow an unconstitutional judicial order cadoman Mar 2025 #5

Who says it's and 'unconstitutional judicial order'? SnoopDog Mar 2025 #9

Honest question: What was illegal about the deportation of the "Venezuelan gang members?" Polybius Mar 2025 #14

Why don't you look it up yourself? SnoopDog Mar 2025 #18

Because it was easier to ask you Polybius Mar 2025 #19

What was "illegal" was the use of the "Alien Enemies Act of 1798" to do it BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #20

Thank you for answering me BumRush! Polybius Mar 2025 #21

When I saw saw your reply, I was literally listening to a local news radio report on this very subject BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #23

The Judicial Branch Decides What Is Constitutional MayReasonRule Mar 2025 #13

While your intent may be laudable your understanding of the legal case at hand and moniss Mar 2025 #16

an act of war isn't necessary to invoke the act, see below cadoman Mar 2025 #25

Let's cut the crap of accepting that just because they moniss Mar 2025 #26

What foreign nation or government would that be, exactly? NickB79 Mar 2025 #29

that is essentially what the EO asserts, it uses the term "hybrid criminal state" (nt) cadoman Mar 2025 #31

I don't believe they are all gang members any more than I believe "their eating the cats and dogs". Cobalt Violet Mar 2025 #24

what gives him the power to unilaterally deport undocumented migrants? cadoman Mar 2025 #2

"It would be a mistake to use our political capital protecting TdA terrorists" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #3

you do know that the ACLU battled a far more extreme use of this power and lost, right? cadoman Mar 2025 #7

Again BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #15

I was referencing sentiment from forum threads, bsky, etc. cadoman Mar 2025 #27

DU is just a "discussion board" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #28

appreciate that cadoman Mar 2025 #32

But you cannot ignore what was in your highlighted section BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #35

agree, and the plaintiffs will have to prove that TdA is an independent org from Venezuela cadoman Mar 2025 #37

If my memory is correct tonkatoy8888 Mar 2025 #8

we have a shit-ton of overcrowded and poorly-funded facilities that desperately need to be improved cadoman Mar 2025 #10

How to convince low information voters Dumpy Mar 2025 #6

Laken Riley agrees! Sea Turtle Mar 2025 #33

Remember all the Do-gooders and garland apologists here? 3825-87867 Mar 2025 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author ancianita Mar 2025 #12

Jail time for whom judge ? republianmushroom Mar 2025 #17

Is there any real proof these are gang members? Cobalt Violet Mar 2025 #22

Doesn't matter how anyone "feels" about it stoned Mar 2025 #30

The problem -AGAIN- is the use of the authority from the "Alien Enemies Act of 1798" BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #34

Post removed Post removed Mar 2025 #36