Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(166,024 posts)

4. In this case

Reply to claudette (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 15, 2025, 08:54 AM

Mar 2025

it was the 45 administration that decided to remove people from there due to the conditions and that happened before that court ruling.

I suppose the court needed to make a decision regardless (I suppose leaving it open to allowing moves there in the future). I expect if they did send any there again, there would probably be an appeal (if there isn't one about to happen in any case to make sure it doesn't happen in the future).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge sides with Trump administration allowing migrants to be held at Guantnamo [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP

Wasn't it claudette Mar 2025 #1

That's what I have in the OP comments BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #2

Sorry I was claudette Mar 2025 #3

In this case BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #4

Oh I see claudette Mar 2025 #5

That place needs to be closed BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #6

Obama wanted it closed Polybius Mar 2025 #7

No one wanted the remaining detainees in their states (even if in a federal super max) BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #8

Disgraceful ruling. NotHardly Mar 2025 #9